Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451251›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022

Developing and testing the ExerciseGuide UK website for people with lung cancer: reflections on the added value of patient and public involvement within a doctoral degree.

Jordan Curry, Helen Roberts, Alan Smith, Diane Riley, Mark Pearson, Cynthia C Forbes

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Feasibility and acceptability of ExerciseGuideUK for those living with and beyond lung cancer: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan CurryWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. Jordan.Curry@hyms.ac.uk.
Helen RobertsHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Alan SmithInvolve Hull, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Diane RileyInvolve Hull, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Mark PearsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Cynthia C ForbesWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Hull York Medical School · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

Yorkshire Cancer Research HEND405CF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer has one of the highest incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Physical activity can provide those diagnosed with lung cancer with several physical and psychological benefits. However, the examination of digitally delivered physical activity to those with lung cancer is not as researched as other common cancers. Often, those diagnosed with lung cancer are older adults (65 years or older). Older adults are often wrongly assumed to lack digital skills, interest, and not engage with digital technology regularly. Although individuals are interested, would involving older people in designing of websites and apps result in better engagement? MAIN BODY: In this article, the authors discuss the process of adapting a digital platform with a patient and public involvement group to provide those who have received a lung cancer diagnosis with a tailored physical activity program and health educational modules. We discuss the influence of recurrent patient and public involvement on the study, the patient and public involvement members, and the doctoral researcher.

conclusionWorking with a patient and public involvement group over several months, especially potential users of a digital intervention, may enhance its relevance, accessibility, and usability. By engaging with patients, family, or caregivers for someone with lung cancer, the doctoral student gained insight into the needs of the study population and what to consider during development. All group members expressed their interest and enjoyment in their involvement, and several are now active members of a wider patient and public involvement network.

Indexed as

Co-designDigital healtheHealthLung cancerPatient and public involvementPhysical activityUsability

Identifiers

PMID36451251
PMCPMC9709754
OpenAlexW4310564894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.