Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451207›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2022

Somatic copy number variant load in neurons of healthy controls and Alzheimer's disease patients.

Zeliha Gözde Turan, Vincent Richter, Jana Bochmann, Poorya Parvizi, Etka Yapar, Ulas Işıldak, Sarah-Kristin Waterholter, Sabrina Leclere-Turbant, Çağdaş Devrim Son, Charles Duyckaerts and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Chromosome instability and aneuploidy in the mammalian brain.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Zeliha Gözde TuranDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey. turan.zelihagozde@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8312-7725
Vincent RichterPaul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Jana BochmannPaul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Poorya ParviziDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Etka YaparDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulas IşıldakDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Sarah-Kristin WaterholterPaul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Sabrina Leclere-TurbantLaboratoire de Neuropathologie Escourolle, Hôpital de La Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Çağdaş Devrim SonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Charles DuyckaertsLaboratoire de Neuropathologie Escourolle, Hôpital de La Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
İdil Yet *Department of Bioinformatics, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
Thomas Arendt *Paul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Mehmet Somel *Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Uwe Ueberham *Paul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. uwe.ueberham@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DEMiddle East Technical University · TRSorbonne Université · FRHacettepe University · TRLund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possible role of somatic copy number variations (CNVs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) aetiology has been controversial. Although cytogenetic studies suggested increased CNV loads in AD brains, a recent single-cell whole-genome sequencing (scWGS) experiment, studying frontal cortex brain samples, found no such evidence. Here we readdressed this issue using low-coverage scWGS on pyramidal neurons dissected via both laser capture microdissection (LCM) and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) across five brain regions: entorhinal cortex, temporal cortex, hippocampal CA1, hippocampal CA3, and the cerebellum. Among reliably detected somatic CNVs identified in 1301 cells obtained from the brains of 13 AD patients and 7 healthy controls, deletions were more frequent compared to duplications. Interestingly, we observed slightly higher frequencies of CNV events in cells from AD compared to similar numbers of cells from controls (4.1% vs. 1.4%, or 0.9% vs. 0.7%, using different filtering approaches), although the differences were not statistically significant. On the technical aspects, we observed that LCM-isolated cells show higher within-cell read depth variation compared to cells isolated with FACS. To reduce within-cell read depth variation, we proposed a principal component analysis-based denoising approach that significantly improves signal-to-noise ratios. Lastly, we showed that LCM-isolated neurons in AD harbour slightly more read depth variability than neurons of controls, which might be related to the reported hyperploid profiles of some AD-affected neurons.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainDNA Copy Number VariationsEntorhinal CortexHumansNeuronsAlzheimer’s diseaseBrainCopy number variationDenoisingFluorescence-activated cell sortingLaser capture microdissectionSingle-cell whole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36451207
PMCPMC9714068
OpenAlexW4310476381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.