Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451204›Full record

SynthesisBMC pharmacology & toxicology2022

Safety of linezolid in patients with decreased renal function and trough monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiaoxi Liu, Mari Aoki, Sumika Osa, Chihiro Ito, Reika Saiki, Tomoya Nagai, Yuki Enoki, Kazuaki Taguchi, Kazuaki Matsumoto

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoxi LiuDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Mari AokiDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Sumika OsaDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Chihiro ItoDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Reika SaikiDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Tomoya NagaiDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Yuki EnokiDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan. enoki-yk@pha.keio.ac.jp.
Kazuaki TaguchiDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Kazuaki MatsumotoDivision of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLinezolid causes hematological toxicity, mostly thrombocytopenia, which leads to treatment discontinuation and failure. Recent studies revealed that during linezolid therapy, the incidence of treatment-related hematological toxicity is significantly higher in patients with decreased renal function (DRF) than in those with normal renal function. Linezolid monitoring is necessary due to the high frequency of hematological toxicity in patients with DRF and the relationship between blood concentration and safety. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety correlation between DRF and trough monitoring.

methodsArticles published before June 24, 2022, on MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the variable effects model.

resultsThe incidence of hematological toxicity was significantly higher in patients with DRF than in those without DRF (OR = 2.37; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis, performed according to hematotoxicity classification, including thrombocytopenia, anemia, and pancytopenia, revealed a significantly higher incidence of thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.45; p < 0.001) and anemia (OR = 2.31; p = 0.006) in patients with DRF than in those without; pancytopenia (OR = 1.41; p = 0.80) incidences were not significantly higher. Based on a systematic review, linezolid trough concentrations > 6-7 μg/mL may be associated with an increased incidence of thrombocytopenia. However, no confidential threshold values for the development of thrombocytopenia were found in the area under the concentration curve values for children or adults.

conclusionWe observed a high frequency of hematological toxicity during linezolid therapy in patients with DRF. To ensure safety, linezolid trough concentrations should be ≤6-7 μg/mL.

Indexed as

PancytopeniaThrombocytopeniaAdultChildHumansKidneyLinezolidOdds RatioLinezolidHematological toxicityLinezolidRenalThrombocytopeniaTrough concentrations

Identifiers

PMID36451204
PMCPMC9714190
OpenAlexW4311025274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.