ArticleBMC health services research2022
Changes in launch delay and availability of pharmaceuticals in 30 European markets over the past two decades.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Price of National Pharmaceutical Pricing in the EU: A Proposal for "Common Procurement".Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- The launch and diffusion of new patented medicines by therapeutic value.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Do GPCRs constitute the target of 30% of newly approved drugs in Germany?Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Price transparency of cancer medicines: a crucial step towards informed pricing negotiations in the European region.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Regulatory efforts to address the access gap for foreign new drugs in China: the priority review program and related policies.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
- Article
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Differences in Patient Access to Newly Approved Antibacterial Drugs in EU/EEA Countries.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Disparities in availability of new cancer drugs worldwide: 1990-2022.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Unmet medical needs definition and incentives: stakeholders perspectives on the reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Are Turkish pharmaceutical pricing strategies an access barrier to oncology medicines for Türkiye?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The impact of level of documentation on the accessibility and affordability of new drugs in Norway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing of the launch of a new drug is an important factor that determines access for patients. We evaluated patient access to pharmaceuticals in 30 European markets over the past two decades.
methodsLaunch dates were extracted from the IQVIA (formerly IMS) database for 30 European countries for all pharmaceuticals launched internationally between 2000 and 2017. We defined launch delay as the difference between the first international launch date and the corresponding national launch date, and calculated these for each country in our sample over time. Additionally, we ranked countries according to their launch delays and looked at changes in the ranking order over time. Lastly, we determined the availability of new pharmaceuticals in each country, calculating this as the percentage of these pharmaceuticals that were available in each country during a pre-specified interval.
resultsThere was a clear trend towards a decrease in launch delays across all countries from 2000 (37.2 months) to 2017 (11.8 months). Over the entire observation period, the three fastest launching countries were the Netherlands, Sweden, and Germany, whereas the three slowest were Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, and Turkey. Germany had the highest availability of new pharmaceuticals with 85.7%, followed by the United Kingdom (83.1%) and Norway (82.9%). Countries with the lowest availability of pharmaceuticals were Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, and Latvia. Gross domestic product per capita was negatively correlated with launch delay (-0.67, p < 0.000) and positively correlated with the availability of pharmaceuticals (+ 0.19, p < 0.000).
conclusionLaunch delay and the availability of pharmaceuticals varied substantially across all 30 European countries. Using countries with above-average availability and below-average launch delays as a benchmark, stakeholders may discuss or modify current pharmaceutical policy, if needed, to improve access to pharmaceutical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.