Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451184›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Association of travel time with mental health service use in primary health care according to contact type - a register-based study in Kainuu, Finland.

Tiina Lankila, Tiina Laatikainen, Katja Wikström, Miika Linna, Harri Antikainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Designing a clustering algorithm for optimizing health station locations.International journal of health geographics · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiina LankilaGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland. tiina.lankila@oulu.fi.
Tiina LaatikainenDepartment of Public Health and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Katja WikströmDepartment of Public Health and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Miika LinnaDepartment of Health and Social Care Management, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Harri AntikainenGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland 312703, 312705, 312707, 336325, 336327 and 336329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aim was to analyse how mental health services are used in different parts of the Kainuu region in Finland and whether travel time to primary health care services is associated with the use of different contact types (in-person visits, remote contacts, home visits).

methodsThe study population included adults who had used mental health services under primary health care (N = 7643) between 2015 and 2019. The travel times to the nearest health centre in a municipality were estimated as the population-weighted average drive time in postal code areas. The Kruskal-Wallis test and pairwise comparisons with Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to assess the differences in mental health service use between health centre areas. A negative binomial regression was performed for the travel time categories using different contact types of mental health service use as outcomes. Models were adjusted for gender, age, number of mental health diseases and the nearest health centre in the municipality.

resultsDistance was negatively associated with mental health service use in health centre in-person visits and in home visits. In the adjusted models, there were 36% fewer in-person visits and 83% fewer home visits in distances further than 30 min, and 67% fewer home visits in a travel time distance of 15-30 min compared with 15 min travel time distance from a health centre. In the adjusted model, in remote contacts, the incidence rate ratios increased with distance, but the association was not statistically significant.

conclusionsThe present study revealed significant differences in mental health service use in relation to travel time and contact type, indicating possible problems in providing services to distant areas. Long travel times can pose a barrier, especially for home care and in-person visits. Remote contacts may partly compensate for the barrier effects of long travel times in mental health services. Especially with conditions that call for the continuation and regularity of care, enabling factors, such as travel time, may be important.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultFinlandHumansPrimary Health CareTravelAccessibilityFinlandGeoinformaticsMental health servicesRegister studyTravel time

Identifiers

PMID36451184
PMCPMC9713086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.