ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022
Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an assessment of frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles in a multinational population of hospitalized patients.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Distinct Epidemiology and Temporal Trends of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in a Newly Established Hospital: A Five-Year Surveillance Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Evolving Triad of Carbapenem Resistance: Emergence of Dominant CRPA, Persistent CRAB, and Rebounding CRKP in a Chinese Regional Hospital (2020-2024).Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Current and future options for the treatment of serious infections due to carbapenem-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- First nationwide survey onAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Activity of ampicillin-sulbactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and comparators againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from intensive care and non-intensive care units and its impact on treatment decisions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- High prevalence of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Multidrug-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Immunocompromised Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Molecular epidemiology and carbapenem resistance mechanisms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Uncovering the Resistance Mechanisms in Extended-Drug-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals high-risk clones ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Hospital-AcquiredInfection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Evaluation and analysis of multidrug resistance- and hypervirulence-associated genes in carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHistorically, multi-drug resistant organisms have been associated with the ICU setting. The present study sought to define the frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) from a global cohort.
methodsMulticenter surveillance study (17 centers from 12 countries) including 672 CR-PA isolates from 2019 to 2021. Phenotypic carbapenemase testing was assessed. Genotypic carbapenemase testing was conducted (CarbaR and CarbaR NxG) to detect β-lactamases. Broth microdilution MICs were established for ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/avibactam.
results59% of CR-PA were isolated from patients outside the ICU. The most common source in ICU and non-ICU patients was respiratory (55% and 30%, respectively). In the ICU, 35% of isolates were phenotypically carbapenemase-positive versus 29% for non-ICU. VIM was the most common carbapenemase (54% and 44%, respectively) followed by GES (27% and 28%, respectively). Susceptibility to ceftazidime or cefepime were relatively low in ICU (39% and 41% of isolates, respectively) and non-ICU (47% and 52% of isolates, respectively). Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were more active with 56% and 66% of isolates susceptible in the ICU while 65% and 76% in non-ICU, respectively. When carbapenemase-negative, 86% and 88% of ICU isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Similarly, in the carbapenemase-negative, non-ICU isolates 88% and 92% of isolates were susceptible, respectively.
conclusionAlthough multidrug resistant pathogens are often regarded as a challenge in the ICU population, the majority of CR-PA were isolated from non-ICU patients. Implementing phenotypic/genotypic testing will assist in guiding treatment. Carbapenem-resistance in P. aeruginosa should be regarded as a surrogate for MDR and this phenotype is increasingly prevalent outside the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.