Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451179›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an assessment of frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles in a multinational population of hospitalized patients.

Christian M Gill, David P Nicolau, ERACE-PA Global Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. First nationwide survey onAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High prevalence of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Immunocompromised Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian M GillCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA. david.nicolau@hhchealth.org.
ERACE-PA Global Study Group
Hartford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, multi-drug resistant organisms have been associated with the ICU setting. The present study sought to define the frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) from a global cohort.

methodsMulticenter surveillance study (17 centers from 12 countries) including 672 CR-PA isolates from 2019 to 2021. Phenotypic carbapenemase testing was assessed. Genotypic carbapenemase testing was conducted (CarbaR and CarbaR NxG) to detect β-lactamases. Broth microdilution MICs were established for ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/avibactam.

results59% of CR-PA were isolated from patients outside the ICU. The most common source in ICU and non-ICU patients was respiratory (55% and 30%, respectively). In the ICU, 35% of isolates were phenotypically carbapenemase-positive versus 29% for non-ICU. VIM was the most common carbapenemase (54% and 44%, respectively) followed by GES (27% and 28%, respectively). Susceptibility to ceftazidime or cefepime were relatively low in ICU (39% and 41% of isolates, respectively) and non-ICU (47% and 52% of isolates, respectively). Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were more active with 56% and 66% of isolates susceptible in the ICU while 65% and 76% in non-ICU, respectively. When carbapenemase-negative, 86% and 88% of ICU isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Similarly, in the carbapenemase-negative, non-ICU isolates 88% and 92% of isolates were susceptible, respectively.

conclusionAlthough multidrug resistant pathogens are often regarded as a challenge in the ICU population, the majority of CR-PA were isolated from non-ICU patients. Implementing phenotypic/genotypic testing will assist in guiding treatment. Carbapenem-resistance in P. aeruginosa should be regarded as a surrogate for MDR and this phenotype is increasingly prevalent outside the ICU.

Indexed as

CeftazidimePseudomonas aeruginosaAzabicyclo CompoundsCarbapenemsCefepimeCephalosporinsPhenotypeTazobactamavibactamAzabicyclo CompoundsCarbapenemsCefepimeCeftazidimeceftolozaneCephalosporinsTazobactamCarbapenem-resistantCeftazidime/avibactamCeftolozane/tazobactamNosocomial pneumoniaPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID36451179
PMCPMC9710170
OpenAlexW4310588804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.