Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451152›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Stressors related to the Covid-19 pandemic, climate change, and the Ukraine crisis, and their impact on stress symptoms in Germany: analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

Roland Weierstall-Pust, Thomas Schnell, Philipp Heßmann, Michael Feld, Max Höfer, Anna Plate, Matthias J Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Climate Change Perception and Mental Health. Results from a Systematic Review of the Literature.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roland Weierstall-Pust *Oberberg Clinics Group, Hausvogteiplatz 10, Berlin, 10117, Germany. roland.weierstall-pust@oberbergkliniken.de.
Thomas Schnell *Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Philipp HeßmannOberberg Clinics Group, Hausvogteiplatz 10, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Michael FeldPrivate Practice for General and Sleep Medicine, Frechen, Germany.
Max HöferHöfermedia Communication Agency, Berlin, Germany.
Anna PlateOberberg Clinics Group, Hausvogteiplatz 10, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Matthias J MüllerOberberg Clinics Group, Hausvogteiplatz 10, Berlin, 10117, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Ukraine crisis are considered unprecedented global stressors, potentially associated with serious health consequences. However, simultaneous effects of these stressors are not yet understood, making it difficult to evaluate their relative contribution to the population burden and potential future manifestations in clinically significant psychiatric disorders. This study aimed at disentangling the relative contribution of the three stressor groups on current sub-clinical stress symptoms.

methodsA cross-sectional, representative survey study was conducted two months after the outbreak of the Ukraine war in Germany. Proportional quota sampling was applied for age, gender, income, and regional characteristics. Data were recruited by means of an online survey. 3094 data sets (1560 females) were included. Age ranged from 18-89 (M: 50.4 years; SD: 17.2). The Subclinical Stress Questionnaire (SSQ-25) served as main outcome measure. In collaboration with a professional media agency, 20 items were generated to capture salient population stressors. A three-factor exploratory structural equation model confirmed the appropriateness of this scale.

results(1) Differences in subjective rankings revealed that stressors related to the Ukraine crisis were rated as most worrying, followed by climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic (Generalized-Linear-Model: Epsilon = .97; F(1.94, 6001.14) = 1026.12, p < .001; η

conclusionsResearchers from the health sciences must consider overlapping effects from population stressors. Although the Ukraine crisis and climate change mark salient stressors, including economic threats, the Covid-19 pandemic still has a profound effect on ill-health and must be considered as a relevant factor in future manifestations of psychiatric and associated health consequences.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeCOVID-19AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsUkraineYoung AdultClimate changeCovert stress effectsCovid-19GermanyPerceived stressPhysical stress responsePsychological stress responseRepresentative cross-sectional studyUkraine war

Identifiers

PMID36451152
PMCPMC9709756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.