Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451120›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Monitoring one heart to help two: heart rate variability and resting heart rate using wearable technology in active women across the perinatal period.

Shon P Rowan, Christa L Lilly, Elizabeth A Claydon, Jenna Wallace, Karen Merryman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shon P RowanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA. srowan@hsc.wvu.edu.
Christa L LillyDepartment of Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-0638
Elizabeth A ClaydonDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-5132
Jenna WallaceDepartments of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry and Pediatrics, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-0494
Karen MerrymanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

National Institutes of Health 5U54GM104942-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharacterizing normal heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate (RHR) in healthy women over the course of a pregnancy allows for further investigation into disease states, as pregnancy is the ideal time period for these explorations due to known decreases in cardiovascular health. To our knowledge, this is the first study to continuously monitor HRV and RHR using wearable technology in healthy pregnant women.

methodsA total of 18 healthy women participated in a prospective cohort study of HRV and RHR while wearing a WHOOP® strap prior to conception, throughout pregnancy, and into postpartum. The study lasted from March 2019 to July 2021; data were analyzed using linear mixed models with splines for non-linear trends.

resultsEighteen women were followed for an average of 405.8 days (SD = 153). Minutes of logged daily activity decreased from 28 minutes pre-pregnancy to 14 minutes by third trimester. A steady decrease in daily HRV and increase in daily RHR were generally seen during pregnancy (HRV Est. = - 0.10, P < 0.0001; RHR Est. = 0.05, P < 0.0001). The effect was moderated by activity minutes for both HRV and RHR. However, at 49 days prior to birth there was a reversal of these indices with a steady increase in daily HRV (Est. = 0.38, P < 0.0001) and decrease in daily RHR (Est. = - 0.23, P < 0.0001), regardless of activity level, that continued into the postpartum period.

conclusionsIn healthy women, there were significant changes to HRV and RHR throughout pregnancy, including a rapid improvement in cardiovascular health prior to birth that was not otherwise known. Physical activity minutes of any type moderated the known negative consequences of pregnancy on cardiovascular health. By establishing normal changes using daily data, future research can now evaluate disease states as well as physical activity interventions during pregnancy and their impact on cardiovascular fitness.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesFemaleHeart RateHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicParturitionPregnancyProspective StudiesCardiovascular physiological phenomenaExerciseMaternal healthPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36451120
PMCPMC9710029
OpenAlexW4310595922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.