Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451092›Full record

ReviewBMC gastroenterology2022

Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review.

Bin Ding, Jun Wang, Xing Wei, Yu Du, Liang Xia, Chenyi Sun, Kun Han, Xue Yang, Xuegang Guo, Yanglin Pan and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bin DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiujiang No.1 People's Hospital, Jiujiang, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 986 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xing WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yuncheng Central Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Yuncheng, China.
Yu DuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second People's Hospital of Qinzhou, Qinzhou, China.
Liang XiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chenyi SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kun HanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xue YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xuegang GuoNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Yanglin PanNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. panyanglin@gmail.com.
Xiangping WangNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. windxp2013@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with situs inversus totalis (SIT) is rarely understood due to its rarity. Patient position and endoscope manipulation were the main concerns in published case reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ERCP in SIT patients.

methodsPatients with SIT who underwent ERCP were enrolled in nine endoscopic centers in China. ERCP procedural details and complications in SIT patients were retrieved from electronic medical record. The data was retrospectively analyzed.

resultsFrom 2011 to 2021, totally 14 patients with SIT undergoing ERCP were identified. The mean age was 56.8 years old and the male-female ratio was 5:2. The main indication for ERCP was common bile duct stones (13/14, 92.9%). All procedure were performed by experienced endoscopists. 21.4% (3/14) of patients were under regular position (prone), while 78.6% under modified position (supine, left or right lateral). Difficult cannulation was occurred in 71.4% (10/14) of patients. The rate of successful cannulation was 85.7% (12/14). Complication occurred in 3 patients (3/14, 21.4%), including 1 bleeding, 1 pneumonia and 1 acute myocardial infarction. No post-pancreatitis or death happened. Compared to patients in modified position, those in prone position had numerically less successful cannulations (66.7% vs. 90.9%) and higher adverse events (33.3% vs. 18.2%).

conclusionsERCP in patient with SIT is challenging even for experienced endoscopists, modified patient positions might have potential benefits concerning more successful cannulations and less complications. More case experiences are need for comprehensive understanding of ERCP in patients with SIT.

Indexed as

GallstonesPancreatitisSitus InversusCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesCannulationComplicationERCPPatient positionSitus inversus totalis

Identifiers

PMID36451092
PMCPMC9714160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.