Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451080›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2023

Validity and reliability of a mobile digital imaging analysis trained by a four-compartment model.

Austin J Graybeal, Caleb F Brandner, Grant M Tinsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Validity of non-traditional measures of obesity compared to total body fat across the life course: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting Bone Mineral Content from Smartphone Digital Anthropometrics: Evaluation of an Existing Application and the Development of New Prediction Models.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Austin J GraybealSchool of Kinesiology & Nutrition, College of Education and Human Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4520-9230
Caleb F BrandnerSchool of Kinesiology & Nutrition, College of Education and Human Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Grant M TinsleyDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital imaging analysis (DIA) estimates collected from mobile applications comprise a novel technique that can collect body composition estimates remotely without the inherent restrictions of other research-grade devices. However, the accuracy of the artificial intelligence used in DIA is reliant on the accuracy of the developmental methods. Few DIA applications are trained by multicompartment models, but this developmental strategy may be most accurate. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the precision and agreement of a DIA application with developmental software trained by a four-compartment (4C) model using an actual 4C model as the criterion method.

methodsFor this cross-sectional study, body composition estimations were collected from 102 participants (63 females, 39 males) using the methods necessary for a rapid 4C model and a DIA application using two different smartphones.

resultsIntraclass correlation coefficients (0.96-0.99; all p < 0.001) and root mean square coefficients of variation (0.5%-3.0%) showed good reliability for body fat percentage, fat mass and fat-free mass. There were no significant mean differences between the 4C model or the DIA estimates for the total sample, by sex, and for non-Hispanic White (n = 61) and Black/African-American (n = 32) participants (all p > 0.050). DIA estimates demonstrated equivalence with the 4C model for all variables but revealed proportional biases that underestimated body fat percentage (both β = -0.25; p < 0.001) and fat mass (both β = -0.07; p < 0.010) at higher degrees of each variable.

conclusionsDIA applications trained by a 4C model are reliable and produce body composition estimates equivalent to an actual 4C model.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBody CompositionAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdipose TissueCross-Sectional StudiesElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of Resultsartificial intelligencebody composition assessmentdigital anthropometrymobile healthobesitysmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36451080
PMCPMC10198803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.