ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2023
Neurobehavioral basis of Maier 3-table and other matching-to-place tasks.
Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Maier 3-table task comprises three phases conducted each day. During the exploration phase, rats explore the entire apparatus. During the information phase, the rats are placed on one of the three tables where food is found. During the test phase, the animals are placed at the starting point on one of the two remaining tables and must enter the goal table where they previously ate. The acquisition of the Maier 3-table task was slowed down after lesions of the septum, fornix, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, or posterior parietal cortex. Because of its time-consuming nature, the Maier 3-table task has more recently been superseded by appetitive matching-to-place in Y- or T-mazes or the circular water maze, because experimenters skip over the exploration phase. Nevertheless, like the Maier 3-table task, the acquisition of the Y- or T-maze matching-to-place task was retarded after lesions of the medial septum or medial prefrontal cortex, more particularly its prelimbic-infralimbic part. Like the previous task, the water-maze version is sensitive to lesions of the medial septum or retrosplenial cortex. Despite methodological differences between the three procedures, these results indicate common neurobiological bases of matching-to-place learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36451026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.