Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450922›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

3D CT-Inclusive Deep-Learning Model to Predict Mortality, ICU Admittance, and Intubation in COVID-19 Patients.

Alberto Di Napoli, Emanuela Tagliente, Luca Pasquini, Enrica Cipriano, Filomena Pietrantonio, Piermaria Ortis, Simona Curti, Alessandro Boellis, Teseo Stefanini, Antonio Bernardini and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto Di Napoli *Radiology Department, Castelli Hospital, 00040, Ariccia, Italy.
Emanuela Tagliente *Medical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), 00165, Rome, Italy.
Luca PasquiniNESMOS Department, Neuroradiology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Via Grottarossa 1035, 00189, 00165, Rome, Italy. lucapasquini3@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1679-6958
Enrica CiprianoCOVID Medicine Department, Castelli Hospital, 00040, Ariccia, Italy.
Filomena PietrantonioCOVID Medicine Department, Castelli Hospital, 00040, Ariccia, Italy.
Piermaria OrtisCOVID Intensive Care Unit, Castelli Hospital, 00040, Ariccia, Italy.
Simona CurtiEmergency Department, Castelli Hospital, 00040, Ariccia, Italy.
Alessandro BoellisRadiology Department, Sant'Andrea Civil Hospital, 19121, La Spezia, Italy.
Teseo StefaniniRadiology Department, Sant'Andrea Civil Hospital, 19121, La Spezia, Italy.
Antonio BernardiniRadiology Department, Giuseppe Mazzini Civil Hospital, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Chiara AngelettiAnestesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Emergency Department, Giuseppe Mazzini Civil Hospital, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Sofia Chiatamone RanieriDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Giuseppe Mazzini Civil Hospital, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Paola FranchiRadiology Department, Giuseppe Mazzini Civil Hospital, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Ioan Paul VoicuRadiology Department, Giuseppe Mazzini Civil Hospital, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Carlo Capotondi *Radiology Department, Castelli Hospital, 00040, Ariccia, Italy.
Antonio Napolitano *Medical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), 00165, Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest CT is a useful initial exam in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for assessing lung damage. AI-powered predictive models could be useful to better allocate resources in the midst of the pandemic. Our aim was to build a deep-learning (DL) model for COVID-19 outcome prediction inclusive of 3D chest CT images acquired at hospital admission. This retrospective multicentric study included 1051 patients (mean age 69, SD = 15) who presented to the emergency department of three different institutions between 20th March 2020 and 20th January 2021 with COVID-19 confirmed by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Chest CT at hospital admission were evaluated by a 3D residual neural network algorithm. Training, internal validation, and external validation groups included 608, 153, and 290 patients, respectively. Images, clinical, and laboratory data were fed into different customizations of a dense neural network to choose the best performing architecture for the prediction of mortality, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The AI model tested on CT and clinical features displayed accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC, respectively, of 91.7%, 90.5%, 92.4%, and 95% for the prediction of patient's mortality; 91.3%, 91.5%, 89.8%, and 95% for intubation; and 89.6%, 90.2%, 86.5%, and 94% for ICU admission (internal validation) in the testing cohort. The performance was lower in the validation cohort for mortality (71.7%, 55.6%, 74.8%, 72%), intubation (72.6%, 74.7%, 45.7%, 64%), and ICU admission (74.7%, 77%, 46%, 70%) prediction. The addition of the available laboratory data led to an increase in sensitivity for patient's mortality (66%) and specificity for intubation and ICU admission (50%, 52%, respectively), while the other metrics maintained similar performance results. We present a deep-learning model to predict mortality, ICU admittance, and intubation in COVID-19 patients. KEY POINTS: • 3D CT-based deep learning model predicted the internal validation set with high accuracy, sensibility and specificity (> 90%) mortality, ICU admittance, and intubation in COVID-19 patients. • The model slightly increased prediction results when laboratory data were added to the analysis, despite data imbalance. However, the model accuracy dropped when CT images were not considered in the analysis, implying an important role of CT in predicting outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningAgedHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceChest CTCOVID-19Deep learningExternal validation

Identifiers

PMID36450922
PMCPMC9713092
OpenAlexW4310436536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.