Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450862›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Solvent-sensitive nanoparticle-enhanced PCR assay for the detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Patcharapong Teawprasong, Yodsathorn Wongngam, Tienrat Tangchaikeeree, Abdelhamid Elaissari, Pramuan Tangboriboonrat, Duangporn Polpanich, Kulachart Jangpatarapongsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patcharapong TeawprasongCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Yodsathorn WongngamNational Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Tienrat TangchaikeereeCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Abdelhamid ElaissariUniv Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon-1, CNRS, ISA-UMR 5280, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Pramuan TangboriboonratDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Phyathai, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Duangporn PolpanichNational Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. duangporn@nanotec.or.th.
Kulachart JangpatarapongsaCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. kulachart.jan@mahidol.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulus-responsive nanoparticles are among the most utilized nanoscale materials in biomedical applications. As these nanoparticles exhibit a manipulable response to a particular stimulus, such as pH, heat, and organic solvent, they are potential signalling units in diagnostic assays. This study aims to enhance the limit of detection and reduce the turnaround time of magnetic nanoparticle polymerase chain reaction (PCR) enzyme-linked gene assay (MELGA), an advanced PCR-based technique termed the solvent-sensitive nanoparticle (SSNP)-enhanced PCR assay. This technique was proposed to detect pathogenic enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) through applying stimulus-responsive nanoparticles. The SSNPs were elaborated with three main components, including mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a structural unit, organic dye (Nile red) as a payload, and the corresponding organic solvent-sensitive polymer shell as "gatekeeper" (poly(maleic anhydride-alt-methyl vinyl ether, PMAMVE). A suitable organic solvent capable of inducing polymer swelling and dye dissolution was investigated by considering a solubility parameter. Using ethanol, the encapsulated Nile red can diffuse out of the SSNPs faster than other solvents and reach a constant concentration within 15 min. For the PCR inhibition study, various SSNPs concentrations (10-30 μg/reaction) were mixed with the ETEC gene and PCR reagent. The results showed that the particles in this concentration range did not inhibit PCR. By comparing the efficacy of conventional PCR, MELGA, and SSNP-enhanced PCR assay, the proposed technique showed a better detection limit than that of PCR, whereas that of MELGA was the lowest. Moreover, compared to MELGA or conventional PCR, this technique provided remarkably faster results in the postamplification process.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliNanoparticlesPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymersSolventsPolymersSolvents

Identifiers

PMID36450862
PMCPMC9712428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.