ArticleScientific reports2022
A multi-scale feature extraction fusion model for human activity recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Powered Flexible Triboelectric-Gated Ion-Gel Transistor for Neuromorphic Tactile Sensing and Human Activity Recognition.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- An enhanced dual inception-attention-BiGRU-attention model integrating wavelet transform for wearable sensor-based human activity recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of LSTM models aided with attention and squeeze and excitation blocks for activity recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Transformer Model with a Convolutional Feature Extractor Block and Vector-Based Relative Position Embedding for Human Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detection and Validation of Macro-Activities in Human Inertial Signals Using Graph Link Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Empowering Participatory Research in Urban Health: Wearable Biometric and Environmental Sensors for Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multivariate CNN Model for Human Locomotion Activity Recognition with a Wearable Exoskeleton Robot.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hybrid convolution neural network with channel attention mechanism for sensor-based human activity recognition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is an important research area in human-computer interaction and pervasive computing. In recent years, many deep learning (DL) methods have been widely used for HAR, and due to their powerful automatic feature extraction capabilities, they achieve better recognition performance than traditional methods and are applicable to more general scenarios. However, the problem is that DL methods increase the computational cost of the system and take up more system resources while achieving higher recognition accuracy, which is more challenging for its operation in small memory terminal devices such as smartphones. So, we need to reduce the model size as much as possible while taking into account the recognition accuracy. To address this problem, we propose a multi-scale feature extraction fusion model combining Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). The model uses different convolutional kernel sizes combined with GRU to accomplish the automatic extraction of different local features and long-term dependencies of the original data to obtain a richer feature representation. In addition, the proposed model uses separable convolution instead of classical convolution to meet the requirement of reducing model parameters while improving recognition accuracy. The accuracy of the proposed model is 97.18%, 96.71%, and 96.28% on the WISDM, UCI-HAR, and PAMAP2 datasets respectively. The experimental results show that the proposed model not only obtains higher recognition accuracy but also costs lower computational resources compared with other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.