Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450796›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Polymer nanoparticles pass the plant interface.

Sam J Parkinson, Sireethorn Tungsirisurp, Chitra Joshi, Bethany L Richmond, Miriam L Gifford, Amrita Sikder, Iseult Lynch, Rachel K O'Reilly, Richard M Napier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sam J ParkinsonSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sireethorn TungsirisurpSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Chitra JoshiSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0045-964X
Bethany L RichmondSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5279-4269
Miriam L GiffordSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4005-2513
Amrita SikderSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Iseult LynchSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-4584
Rachel K O'ReillySchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. r.oreilly@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-7172
Richard M NapierSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. richard.napier@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0605-518X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P002145/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As agriculture strives to feed an ever-increasing number of people, it must also adapt to increasing exposure to minute plastic particles. To learn about the accumulation of nanoplastics by plants, we prepared well-defined block copolymer nanoparticles by aqueous dispersion polymerisation. A fluorophore was incorporated via hydrazone formation and uptake into roots and protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana was investigated using confocal microscopy. Here we show that uptake is inversely proportional to nanoparticle size. Positively charged particles accumulate around root surfaces and are not taken up by roots or protoplasts, whereas negatively charged nanoparticles accumulate slowly and become prominent over time in the xylem of intact roots. Neutral nanoparticles penetrate rapidly into intact cells at the surfaces of plant roots and into protoplasts, but xylem loading is lower than for negative nanoparticles. These behaviours differ from those of animal cells and our results show that despite the protection of rigid cell walls, plants are accessible to nanoplastics in soil and water.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisNanoparticlesAnimalsBiological TransportMicroplasticsPolymerizationPolymersWaterMicroplasticsPolymersWater

Identifiers

PMID36450796
PMCPMC9712430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.