ArticleScientific reports2022
Development of eye phantom for mimicking the deformation of the human cornea accompanied by intraocular pressure alterations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- An LSPR-Active AuNP-Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens for Continuous Ocular Strain Sensing: From Engineering Design to In Vivo Validation.Biosensors · 2026Article
- A Novel Approach to Fabricate Early Keratoconus Phantom Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Gel-based Ocular Phantom Models in Glaucoma Diagnostics: A Bibliometric and Narrative Review.Journal of current glaucoma practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative studies between artificial eyeball phantoms and in-vivo human subjects were carried out to better understanding the structural deformation of the cornea under varying intraocular pressure (IOP). The IOP-induced deformation and the tension of the cornea were measured by using an optical coherence tomography and noncontact tonometer readings, respectively. The dependence of the central cornea thickness (CCT) and corneal radius of curvature (CRC) on the IOP differed significantly between the full eyeball phantom (FEP) and cornea eyeball phantom (CEP) models. While the CCT changes were very similar between the two models, the relation between the CRC and the IOP was dependent on the type of eye phantom. For the CEP, the CRC drastically decreased as internal pressure increased. However, we found that the changes in the CRC of FEP was dependent on initial CCT under zero IOP (CCT
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.