Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450763›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2022

Treatment discontinuation, patient-reported toxicities and quality-of-life by age following trastuzumab emtansine or paclitaxel/trastuzumab (ATEMPT).

Tal Sella, Yue Zheng, Nabihah Tayob, Kathryn J Ruddy, Rachel A Freedman, Chau Dang, Denise Yardley, Steven J Isakoff, Vicente Valero, Michelle DeMeo and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01853748 (A Randomized Phase II Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01853748 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase II Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) vs. Paclitaxel in Combination With Trastuzumab for Stage I HER2-Positive Breast Cancer (ATEMPT Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2013 to 2022Enrolled512ConditionsBreast CancerArmsTrastuzumab, Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab emtansine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Tal SellaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Yue ZhengDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-813X
Nabihah TayobDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathryn J RuddyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-332X
Rachel A FreedmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Chau DangDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-2265
Denise YardleySarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA.
Steven J IsakoffMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-1014
Vicente ValeroThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Michelle DeMeoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Harold J BursteinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric P WinerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Antonio C WolffJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-1063
Ian KropDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-5944
Ann H PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-4824
Sara M TolaneyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Sara_Tolaney@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-8671
Harvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSarah Cannon · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the ATEMPT trial, adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) compared to paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (TH) for stage I HER2-positive breast cancer improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs), while maintaining excellent disease outcomes. We report treatment discontinuation and use multivariable models to compare, patient-reported toxicity and quality-of-life (QOL) by age (≤50, >50) and treatment arm at 18 months post-enrollment among 366 eligible participants randomized in a 3:1 ratio to T-DM1 or TH. T-DM1 discontinuation was higher among women >50 vs. ≤50 (23% vs. 9%, p = 0.003, Fisher's Exact test) with 4%, 8%, and 17% of older patients discontinuing treatment by 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. Superior QOL with T-DM1 vs. TH was observed among women ≤50 with estimated mean difference of 6.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-12.46) and driven by better social/family well-being and breast cancer-specific sub-scores. Among women >50, T-DM1 was associated with superior physical well-being and less activity impairment, with no differences in global QOL. Older women had decreased neuropathy with T-DM1 vs. TH. De-escalated treatment regimens for HER2 positive breast cancer may have age-varying impact on treatment tolerance, toxicities and subsequent QOL, which should be considered when selecting therapy options.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01853748.

Identifiers

PMID36450763
PMCPMC9712612
OpenAlexW4310640864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.