Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450651›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Joint association of food nutritional profile by Nutri-Score front-of-pack label and ultra-processed food intake with mortality: Moli-sani prospective cohort study.

Marialaura Bonaccio, Augusto Di Castelnuovo, Emilia Ruggiero, Simona Costanzo, Giuseppe Grosso, Amalia De Curtis, Chiara Cerletti, Maria Benedetta Donati, Giovanni de Gaetano, Licia Iacoviello and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modifying the Health Star Rating nutrient profiling algorithm to account for ultra-processing.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marialaura BonaccioDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy marialaura.bonaccio@moli-sani.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-6552
Augusto Di CastelnuovoMediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy.
Emilia RuggieroDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Simona CostanzoDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Giuseppe GrossoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Amalia De CurtisDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Chiara CerlettiDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Maria Benedetta DonatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Giovanni de GaetanoDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Licia IacovielloDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Moli-sani Study Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo jointly analyse two food dimensions, the Food Standards Agency Nutrient Profiling System (FSAm-NPS), used to derive the Nutri-Score front-of-pack label, and the NOVA classification in relation to mortality.

designProspective cohort study.

settingMoli-sani Study, Italy 2005-10.

participants22 895 participants (mean age 55 (SD 12) years; 48% men). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Associations between dietary exposures and mortality risk, assessed using multivariable cause specific Cox proportional hazard models controlled for known risk factors.

resultsA total of 2205 deaths occurred during 272 960 person years of follow-up. In the highest quarter of the FSAm-NPS index compared with the lowest quarter, multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for all cause and cardiovascular mortality were 1.19 (95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.35; absolute risk difference 4.3%, 95% confidence interval 1.4% to 7.2%) and 1.32 (1.06 to 1.64; 2.6%, 0.3% to 4.9%), respectively. The hazard ratios were 1.19 (1.05 to 1.36; absolute risk difference 9.7%, 5.0% to 14.3%) and 1.27 (1.02 to 1.58; 5.0%, 1.2% to 8.8%), respectively, for all cause and cardiovascular mortality when the two extreme categories of ultra-processed food intake were compared. When these two indices were analysed jointly, the magnitude of the association of the FSAm-NPS dietary index with all cause and cardiovascular mortality was attenuated by 22.3% and 15.4%, respectively, whereas mortality risks associated with high ultra-processed food intake were not altered.

conclusionsAdults with the lowest quality diet, as measured using the FSAm-NPS dietary index (underpinning the Nutri-Score), and the highest ultra-processed food consumption (NOVA classification) were at the highest risk for all cause and cardiovascular mortality. A significant proportion of the higher mortality risk associated with an elevated intake of nutrient poor foods was explained by a high degree of food processing. In contrast, the relation between a high ultra-processed food intake and mortality was not explained by the poor quality of these foods.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesNutrientsAdultEatingFast FoodsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesNutrients

Identifiers

PMID36450651
PMCPMC9430377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.