ArticleBMJ open2022
Outcomes of a community-based antiretroviral therapy programme for key populations living with HIV in Benue State, Nigeria: protocol for a realist evaluation.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKey populations (KP) living with HIV are underserved and often face social and health system barriers to HIV care. To optimise access to quality HIV services among KP, the WHO recommended community-based approaches to HIV service delivery for KP. However, to inform the successful rollout and scale-up of community-based antiretroviral therapy service delivery models for KP (KP-CBART), there is a need to study the programme implementation. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of KP-CBART in Benue State Nigeria using a realist impact evaluation approach. Our evaluation question is: what are the mechanisms and context conditions that drive successful community-based implementation and how do these lead to better retention in care, treatment adherence and viral suppression among which categories of KP? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be conducted in three phases, relying on a mixed-method design and following the realist evaluation cycle. The first phase is the development of the initial programme theory grounded in a scoping review, programme and policy document review and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. In phase 2, findings from case studies of KP-CBART programme implementation in one Nigerian state are used to test the initial programme theory and to refine it. The quantitative part is a retrospective cohort study. All HIV-positive KP clients enrolled into the KP-CBART between 2016 and 2020 will be included in the study. While maximum variation and data saturation will inform sample size for the qualitative part, an estimated 90 purposively selected study participants will be interviewed. In phase 3, findings will be synthesised into a middle-range theory through cross-case analysis. The heuristic intervention, context, agents, mechanisms and outcomes (ICAMO) tool will be used to refine the initial programme theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of APIN Public Health Initiatives (IRB022-FR), Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp (1503/21), and the Benue State Ministry of Health and Human Services (MOH/STA/204/VOL1/154). Written informed consent will be obtained from all study participants. Study results will be disseminated through stakeholders meeting, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.