Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450404›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person consultations on diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Jared Lane, Katrina David, Jayashanthi Ramarao, Kanesha Ward, Sunayana Raghuraman, Moomna Waheed, Annie Ys Lau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jared LaneCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia jared.lane@students.mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-6354
Katrina DavidCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Jayashanthi RamaraoCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Kanesha WardCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Sunayana RaghuramanCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Moomna WaheedCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Annie Ys LauCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable impact on primary care, resulting in rapid uptake of telehealth. Patients with chronic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), relied heavily on telehealth consultations during this period. It is important to assess whether tasks observed during T2DM or CVD in-person consultations are translatable to telehealth.

aimTo explore the extent to which in-person GP consultations are translatable to telehealth for patients with T2DM or CVD. DESIGN &

settingThis study screened 281 GP consultations conducted in 2017 within the UK general practice setting for consultations pertaining to T2DM or CVD. Seventeen in-person consultations (in deidentified video and transcript) were selected for further analysis.

methodDetailed reporting of tasks, physical artefacts, and physical examinations observed during in-person GP consultations. A new scoring method, applying two key metrics, supporting definitions and examples, was designed to assess translatability of clinical tasks to telehealth.

resultsAcross the 17 T2DM or CVD in-person consultations analysed, 23 clinical tasks, 21 physical artefacts, and nine physical examinations were observed. Sixty per cent of tasks analysed were deemed either easily or relatively easily translatable to telehealth. Twenty-six per cent of tasks were rated as 'moderately translatable to telehealth' but may require a patient obtaining their own equipment. Thirteen per cent of tasks were rated as 'potentially translatable to telehealth'. No clinical tasks for these cohorts were rated as untranslatable to telehealth.

conclusionThe majority of tasks observed during T2DM or CVD in-person GP consultations are translatable to telehealth. Further research is warranted to investigate emergent safety concerns from increased uptake of telehealth.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasesCOVID-19diabetes mellitus, type 2general practiceprimary healthcaretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36450404
PMCPMC10354331
OpenAlexW4310378697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.