Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450381›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab in avelumab-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicenter study of the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG.

Valerie Glutsch, Patrick Schummer, Hermann Kneitz, Anja Gesierich, Matthias Goebeler, Detlef Klein, Christian Posch, Christoffer Gebhardt, Sebastian Haferkamp, Lisa Zimmer and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Valerie GlutschDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Patrick SchummerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Hermann KneitzDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Anja GesierichDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Matthias GoebelerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Detlef KleinInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Christian PoschDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Vienna Healthcare Group, Wien, Austria.
Christoffer GebhardtDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-9584
Sebastian HaferkampDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lisa ZimmerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jürgen C BeckerGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ulrike LeiterDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany.
Michael WeichenthalDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9060-4961
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-6704
Bastian SchillingDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany Schilling_B@ukw.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8859-4103
European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DESigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · ATUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, highly aggressive skin cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. Immune checkpoint inhibition has significantly improved treatment outcomes in metastatic disease with response rates to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibition of up to 62%. However, primary and secondary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition remains a so far unsolved clinical challenge since effective and safe treatment options for these patients are lacking.Fourteen patients with advanced (non-resectable stage III or stage IV, Union international contre le cancer 2017) Merkel cell carcinoma with primary resistance to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab receiving subsequent therapy (second or later line) with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (IPI/NIVO) were identified in the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOREG. Five of these 14 patients were reported previously and were included in this analysis with additional follow-up. Overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were analyzed.All 14 patients received avelumab as first-line treatment. Thereof, 12 patients had shown primary resistance with progressive disease in the first tumor assessment, while two patients had initially experienced a short-lived stabilization (stable disease). Six patients had at least one systemic treatment in between avelumab and IPI/NIVO. In total, 7 patients responded to IPI/NIVO (overall response rate 50%), and response was ongoing in 4 responders at last follow-up. After a median follow-up of 18.85 months, median PFS was 5.07 months (95% CI 2.43-not available (NA)), and median OS was not reached. PFS rates at 12 months and 24 months were 42.9% and 26.8 %, respectively. The OS rate at 36 months was 64.3%. Only 3 (21%) patients did not receive all 4 cycles of IPI/NIVO due to immune-related adverse events.In this multicenter evaluation, we observed high response rates, a durable benefit and promising OS rates after treatment with later-line combined IPI/NIVO. In conclusion, our patient cohort supports our prior findings with an encouraging activity of second-line or later-line IPI/NIVO in patients with anti-PD-L1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellSkin NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProspective StudiesRegistriesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedavelumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorB7-H1 AntigenCTLA-4 AntigenDrug Therapy, CombinationProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36450381
PMCPMC9716995
OpenAlexW4310580562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.