ArticleBlood research2022
Reduced-intensity conditioning versus myeloablative conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis.
Article in Blood research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous stem cell transplantation with thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide conditioning in patients with central nervous system lymphoma: a phase II study.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- Reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning for MDS: long-term results of an EBMT phase III study (RICMAC).Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Trial
- Expanding the spectrum of post-HSCT hemolysis: from passenger lymphocyte syndrome to host- and graft-associated alloimmune hemolytic anemia.Blood research · 2026Review
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with AML and MDS: navigating risks and optimizing outcomes.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- Optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: eligibility, best practices, and improving transplant outcomes.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Janus kinase inhibition in the treatment and prevention of graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Monitoring measurable residual disease and chimerism in patients with JAK2 V617F-positive myelofibrosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the sole curative option for myelofibrosis (MF). However, it is unknown as to which of the two, myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), is a better preconditioning regimen. Methods: Twenty-five patients with MF were treated with alloSCT, 12 of whom underwent RIC. Baseline characteristics, response to alloSCT, adverse events, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and survival outcomes were reviewed. Results: There was no difference in the neutrophil engraftment rate and time to engraftment between MAC vs. RIC. The time to platelet engraftment was significantly longer in the MAC group (median, 112.8 vs. 28.8 days for MAC vs. RIC, respectively, Conclusion: RIC offers a significant advantage over MAC, even in younger patients with MF undergoing alloSCT, in terms of cell engraftment, rate of complete chimerism achievement, and incidence of acute GVHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.