Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450310›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

Dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation to treat tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial.

Emilie Cardon, Laure Jacquemin, Hanne Vermeersch, Iris Joossen, Julie Moyaert, Griet Mertens, Olivier M Vanderveken, Marc J W Lammers, Paul Van de Heyning, Vincent Van Rompaey and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Focal tDCS of auditory cortex in chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled mechanistic trial.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Neuroscientific therapies for subjective tinnitus.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent Updates on Tinnitus Management.Journal of audiology & otology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie CardonDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-5989
Laure JacqueminDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Hanne VermeerschUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Iris JoossenUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Julie MoyaertUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Griet MertensDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Olivier M VandervekenDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marc J W LammersDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Paul Van de HeyningDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vincent Van RompaeyDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Annick GillesDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BEUniversity College Ghent · BE

Funding

University of Antwerp T001618N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a potential intervention for subjective tinnitus, but supporting evidence remains limited. We aimed to investigate the effect of anodal high-definition tDCS of the left temporal area and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on tinnitus severity. This double-blind randomized controlled trial included 77 patients (age range 18-79, 43 male) with chronic subjective tinnitus as their primary complaint. Thirty-eight subjects received six consecutive sessions of dual-site sequential high-definition-tDCS with electrodes positioned over the left temporal area and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Both areas were stimulated for 15 min per session, with total stimulation time amounting to 30 min. Thirty-nine subjects received sham stimulation. The primary outcome measure was the change in tinnitus severity, as evaluated by the Tinnitus Functional Index, from baseline to a follow-up visit at 8 ± 2 weeks after treatment completion. Secondary outcomes included changes in perceived tinnitus loudness, as measured with a visual analogue scale and a tinnitus matching procedure, as well as scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Hyperacusis Questionnaire. No differences in Tinnitus Functional Index change scores were identified between the active treatment and sham control groups (linear regression: P = 0.86). The Tinnitus Functional Index scores decreased significantly over time in both groups (P = 0.0012), indicating the presence of a considerable placebo effect. These change scores were significantly influenced by sex (linear regression: P = 0.037) and baseline symptoms of anxiety (linear regression: P = 0.049) in both groups. In general, Tinnitus Functional Index scores decreased more profoundly in males and in subjects with a higher degree of anxiety at baseline. None of the included secondary measures differed significantly between experimental arms. Our results suggest that dual-site sequential high-definition-tDCS of the left temporal area and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not alleviate tinnitus severity. Interestingly, in our study population, fluctuations in tinnitus severity were influenced by gender and concurrent mental condition. It is therefore important to take these factors into account when conducting or planning randomized controlled trials in tinnitus populations.

Indexed as

TinnitusTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultneuromodulationrandomized controlled trialtinnitustranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36450310
PMCPMC9762937
OpenAlexW4310449148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.