Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449974›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de enfermagem2022

Simulated scenarios in nursing: an integrative literature review.

Gustavo Correa de Amorim, Fabiana Cristina Pires Bernardinelli, Juliana da Silva Garcia Nascimento, Ingrid Fidelix de Souza, Divanice Contim, Suzel Regina Ribeiro Chavaglia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gustavo Correa de AmorimUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9695-7904
Fabiana Cristina Pires BernardinelliUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-1449
Juliana da Silva Garcia NascimentoUniversidade de São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-2738
Ingrid Fidelix de SouzaUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3856-9676
Divanice ContimUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-1465
Suzel Regina Ribeiro ChavagliaUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7033-0185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto identify in scientific literature which simulated clinical scenarios were developed and validated for teaching and learning in nursing.

methodsintegrative review, carried out in seven sources of information. The Rayyan program was used for selection, content analysis to explore the findings and the methodological assessment tool of the validity process, entitled Quality Appraisal tool for Validity Studies.

resultsinitially, 1,179 manuscripts were identified and 14 were part of the sample. Two categories were defined: Profile of simulated clinical scenarios produced in nursing; and Clinical skills developed and their assessment mechanisms. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: there was a preponderance of high-fidelity scenarios, built in Brazil in the last five years, aimed at nursing students on the themes of emergency, maternal care and stomatherapy, addressing the assessment of cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills in nursing. Most studies obtained good methodological quality in their content validity process.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesStudents, NursingBrazilClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansLearningPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36449974
PMCPMC9728818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.