ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2022
Clinical analysis on the influencing factors related to preterm twin pregnancy.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Singleton and Twin Pregnancies: A Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perinatal deaths in twin and singleton infants in Ireland: A comparison of characteristics and causes.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Maturation in Prematurely Born Twin and Singleton Infants: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the influencing factors of preterm twin pregnancy.
methodsIn total, 602 twin-pregnant women delivered from February 2016 to February 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to whether the pregnant women were preterm or not, they were divided into preterm group (n=363) and term group (n=239). Baseline information, such as maternal age, address, and education level of the pregnant women, were collected. The clinical information of pregnant women, such as chorionic, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, premature rupture of membranes, abnormal fetal position, and fetal weight, were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsIn the preterm group, monochorionic diamniotic comorbidities were significantly higher compared with the control group (p<0.05). Higher risks of preterm group have lower education (p<0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that education, preeclampsia, and premature rupture of membranes were risk factors for preterm twin pregnancy.
conclusionsPreterm birth in twin pregnancy is associated with many risk factors, such as education, preeclampsia, and premature rupture of membranes. Pregnancy supervision and prenatal guidance for twin pregnancy should be strengthened. Furthermore, early detection and diagnosis of comorbidities can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.