Trial reportRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2022
Evaluation of pulmonary nodules by magnetic resonance imaging sequences: which sequence will replace computed tomography?
Trial report in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Evaluation of pulmonary nodules by magnetic resonance imaging sequences: which sequence will replace computed tomography?"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the role of magnetic resonance imaging in minimizing radiation exposure, especially in the follow-up of pulmonary nodules.
methodsPatients who applied to our hospital between April 2013 and August 2018 for various reasons and had lung-mediastinal dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and thoracic computed tomography were included in the study. A total of 194 patients were included in the study, involving 84 females and 110 males. Scanning of the nodules was done retrospectively. This study was conducted by two readers: a thoracic radiologist with 15 years of experience and a nonspecific radiologist with 4 years of experience. Evaluations were made using the double-blind method.
resultsOf the 194 patients, 84 (43.3%) were female and 110 (56.7%) were male. For the first reader, 135 (69.5%) nodules were detected in postcontrast T1 vibe images, 130 (67%) in T2 fast spin echo, 128 (66%) in precontrast T1 vibe, and 98 (50.5%) in T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence. For the second reader, 133 (68%) nodules were detected in postcontrast T1 vibe images, 120 (61.9%) in T2 fast spin echo, 122 (62.9%) in precontrast T1 vibe, and 99 (51%) in T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence. Capability levels were examined in detecting nodules between the first and second readers, and the ratios were reached at 0.92 in T2 fast spin echo, 0.81 in postcontrast T1 vibe images, 0.93 in precontrast T1 vibe, and 0.96 in T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence.
conclusionIn this study of detecting pulmonary nodules by magnetic resonance imaging, which we performed with two different readers, one of whom was an experienced thoracic radiologist, both readers found the highest detection rate in the postcontrast T1 vibe sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.