Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449545›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Inflammatory response to retrotransposons drives tumor drug resistance that can be prevented by reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Ksenia A Novototskaya-Vlasova, Nickolay S Neznanov, Ivan Molodtsov, Brandon M Hall, Mairead Commane, Anatoli S Gleiberman, Jayne Murray, Michelle Haber, Murray D Norris, Katerina I Leonova and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Retrotransposons in embryogenesis and neurodevelopment.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ksenia A Novototskaya-VlasovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Nickolay S NeznanovDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Ivan MolodtsovDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Brandon M HallGenome Protection, Inc., Buffalo, NY 14263.ORCID 0000-0003-1650-7191
Mairead CommaneDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Anatoli S GleibermanGenome Protection, Inc., Buffalo, NY 14263.ORCID 0000-0001-8491-0826
Jayne MurrayChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Michelle HaberChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-8817
Murray D NorrisChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-4589
Katerina I LeonovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Andrei V GudkovDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of endogenous retrotransposons frequently occurs in cancer cells and contributes to tumor genomic instability. To test whether inhibition of retrotranspositions has an anticancer effect, we used treatment with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) stavudine (STV) in mouse cancer models, MMTV-HER2/Neu and Th-MYCN, that spontaneously develop breast cancer and neuroblastoma, respectively. In both cases, STV in drinking water did not affect tumor incidence nor demonstrate direct antitumor effects. However, STV dramatically extended progression-free survival in both models following an initial complete response to chemotherapy. To approach the mechanism underlying this phenomenon, we analyzed the effect of NRTI on the selection of treatment-resistant variants in tumor cells in culture. Cultivation of mouse breast carcinoma 4T1 in the presence of STV dramatically reduced the frequency of cells capable of surviving treatment with anticancer drugs. Global transcriptome analysis demonstrated that the acquisition of drug resistance by 4T1 cells was accompanied by an increase in the constitutive activity of interferon type I and NF-κB pathways and an elevated expression of LINE-1 elements, which are known to induce inflammatory responses via their products of reverse transcription. Treatment with NRTI reduced NF-κB activity and reverted drug resistance. Furthermore, the inducible expression of LINE-1 stimulated inflammatory response and increased the frequency of drug-resistant variants in a tumor cell population. These results indicate a mechanism by which retrotransposon desilencing can stimulate tumor cell survival during treatment and suggest reverse transcriptase inhibition as a potential therapeutic approach for targeting the development of drug-resistant cancers.

Indexed as

RetroelementsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAnimalsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceNF-kappa BNF-kappa BRetroelementsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsinterferonLINE-1multidrug resistanceNF-kappaBprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID36449545
PMCPMC9894111
OpenAlexW4310434702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.