Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449489›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prognostic factors and outcomes in women with breast cancer in Slovenia in relation to step-wise implementation of organized screening.

Sonja Tomšič, Tina Žagar, Ana Mihor, Miran Mlakar, Katarina Lokar, Katja Jarm, Vesna Zadnik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonja TomšičEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-1789
Tina ŽagarEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0532-1351
Ana MihorEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miran MlakarEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katarina LokarEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katja JarmSlovenian Breast Cancer Screening Programme DORA, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vesna ZadnikEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of organized breast cancer screening is early detection and reduction in mortality. Organized screening should promote equal access and reduce socio-economic inequalities. In Slovenia, organized breast cancer screening achieved complete coverage in 11-years' time. We explored whether step-wise implementation reflects in prognostic factors (earlier diagnosis and treatment) and survival of breast cancer patients in our population.

methodsUsing population-based cancer registry and screening registry data on breast cancer cases from 2008-2018, we compared stage distribution and mean time to surgical treatment in (A) women who underwent at least one mammography in the organized screening programme, women who received at least one invitation but did not undergo mammography and women who did not receive any screening invitation, and in (B) women who were invited to organized screening and those who were not. We also compared net survival by stage in different groups of women according to their screening programme status.

resultsWomen who underwent at least one mammography in organized screening had lower disease stage at diagnosis. Time-to-treatment analysis showed mean time to surgery was shortest in women not included in organized screening (all stages = 36.0 days vs. 40.3 days in women included in organized screening). This could be due to quality assurance protocols with an obligatory multidisciplinary approach within the organized screening vs. standard treatment pathways which can vary in different (smaller) hospitals. Higher standard of care in screening is reflected in better survival in women included in organized screening (5-years net survival for regional stage: at least one mammography in the screening programme- 96%; invitation, but no mammography- 87.4%; no invitation or mammography in the screening programme- 82.6%).

conclusionOur study, which is one of the first in central European countries, shows that introduction of organized screening has temporary effects on population cancer burden indicators already during roll-out period, which should therefore be as short as possible.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyPrognosisSlovenia

Identifiers

PMID36449489
PMCPMC9710755
OpenAlexW4310434294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.