Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449326›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Ice Flavor-Related Discussions on Twitter: Content Analysis.

Artur Galimov, Julia Vassey, Ellen Galstyan, Jennifer B Unger, Matthew G Kirkpatrick, Jon-Patrick Allem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Categorizing E-cigarette-related tweets using BERT topic modeling.Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oral Nicotine Gum Discussions on Twitter: Content Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Artur GalimovDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9718-439X
Julia VasseyDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-2000
Ellen GalstyanDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1350-5983
Jennifer B UngerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9064-6603
Matthew G KirkpatrickDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2586-9514
Jon-Patrick AllemDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9135-8689
University of Southern California · US

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jennifer Beth Unger · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA180905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently restricted characterizing flavors in tobacco products. As a result, ice hybrid-flavored e-cigarettes, which combine a cooling flavor with fruit or other flavors (eg, banana ice), emerged on the market. Like menthol, ice-flavored e-cigarettes produce a cooling sensory experience. It is unclear if ice hybrid-flavored e-cigarettes should be considered characterizing flavors or menthol, limiting regulatory action. Monitoring the public's conversations about ice-flavored e-cigarettes on Twitter may help inform the tobacco control community about these products and contribute to the US FDA policy targets in the future.

objectiveThis study documented the themes pertaining to vaping and ice flavor-related conversations on Twitter. Our goal was to identify key conversation trends and ascertain users' recent experiences with ice-flavored e-cigarette products.

methodsPosts containing vaping-related (eg, "vape," "ecig," "e-juice," or "e-cigarette") and ice-related (ie, "Ice," "Cool," "Frost," and "Arctic") terms were collected from Twitter's streaming application programming interface from January 1 to July 21, 2021. After removing retweets, a random sample of posts (N=2001) was selected, with 590 posts included in the content analysis. Themes were developed through an inductive approach. Theme co-occurrence was also examined.

resultsMany of the 590 posts were marked as (or consisted of) marketing material (n=306, 51.9%), contained positive personal testimonials (n=180, 30.5%), and mentioned disposable pods (n=117, 19.8%). Other themes had relatively low prevalence in the sample: neutral personal testimonials (n=45, 7.6%), cannabidiol products (n=41, 7%), negative personal testimonials (n=41, 7%), "official" flavor description (n=37, 6.3%), ice-flavored JUUL (n=19, 3.2%), information seeking (n=14, 2.4%), and comparison to combustible tobacco (n=10, 1.7%). The most common co-occurring themes in a single tweet were related to marketing and disposable pods (n=73, 12.4%).

conclusionsOur findings offer insight into the public's experience with and understanding of ice-flavored e-cigarette products. Ice-flavored e-cigarette products are actively marketed on Twitter, and the messages about them are positive. Public health education campaigns on the harms of flavored e-cigarettes may help to reduce positive social norms about ice-flavored products. Future studies should evaluate the relationship between exposure to personal testimonials of ice-flavored vaping products and curiosity, harm perceptions, and experimentation with these products among priority populations.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaVapingHumansIceMentholNicotianaUnited StatesIceMenthole-cigaretteelectronic cigarettesFDAice flavorsinfodemiologypublicpublic healthsmokingsocial mediatobaccotobacco policyTwittervaping

Identifiers

PMID36449326
PMCPMC9752452
OpenAlexW4310686251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.