Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449250›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2024

Comparison of the Role of Different Levels of Religiousness and Spirituality in Controversial Ethical Issues and Clinical Practice among Brazilian Resident Physicians: Results from the Multicenter SBRAMER Study.

Ana Paula Sena Lomba Vasconcelos, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Ana Paula Rodrigues Cavalcanti, Simone Regina Souza da Silva Conde, Lidia Maria Gonçalves, Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi, Ana Cláudia Santos Chazan, Rubens Lene Carvalho Tavares, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel, Giancarlo Lucchetti

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Paula Sena Lomba VasconcelosSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio Do Nascimento, S/N° - Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Alessandra Lamas Granero LucchettiSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio Do Nascimento, S/N° - Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Ana Paula Rodrigues CavalcantiDepartment of Religious Sciences, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Conj. Pres. Castelo Branco III, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Simone Regina Souza da Silva CondeSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Av. Generalíssimo Deodoro, 01-Guamá , Belém, Brazil.
Lidia Maria GonçalvesSchool of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 155 - Setor Azul, São Paulo, Brazil.
Emilio Hideyuki MoriguchiSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, R. Ramiro Barcelos, 2400 - Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ana Cláudia Santos ChazanSchool of Medicine, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Professor Manoel de Abreu 444 - 2Nd Floor - Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rubens Lene Carvalho TavaresSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Oscarina da Silva EzequielSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio Do Nascimento, S/N° - Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Giancarlo LucchettiSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Av. Eugênio Do Nascimento, S/N° - Dom Bosco, Juiz de Fora, Brazil. g.lucchetti@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-9476
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares clinical practice and objections to controversial ethical issues among 836 Brazilian resident physicians according to levels of religiousness/spirituality. Residents with low religiousness/spirituality (s/r) believed less in the influence of spirituality on clinical practice, were less comfortable addressing this issue, tended to listen less carefully and try to change the subject more than other groups. Residents with high spirituality and low religiousness (S/r) inquired more about religious/spiritual issues, while those with high religiousness/spirituality (S/R) were more supportive and reported fewer barriers to addressing these issues. Concerning ethical issues (e.g., physician-assisted suicide, withdrawal of life support, abortion), S/R had more objections than others.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedPhysiciansSpiritual TherapiesBrazilFemaleHumansPregnancyReligionSpiritualityClinical practiceControversial ethical issuesReligion and medicineResident physiciansSpirituality

Identifiers

PMID36449250
OpenAlexW4310385463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.