Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449249›Full record

Observational studyJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis-The New Criteria Fail to Recognize Significant Presentations.

Marcus Holmberg, Jacob Schou, Patrik Larsson, Hussain Raza Shah Syed, Stefan Gilg, Ernesto Sparrelid, Poya Ghorbani

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Post-pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis in Distal Pancreatectomies - a Rare Bird According to the New Definition.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Observational
  9. Pancreatectomy and Pancreatic Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus HolmbergDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. marcus.holmberg@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7217-4240
Jacob SchouDepartment of Surgery, Capio S:t Görans Sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrik LarssonDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hussain Raza Shah SyedDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan GilgDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ernesto SparrelidDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Poya GhorbaniDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SESaint Göran Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) is a newly described clinical entity defined as elevated serum amylase sustained ≥ 48 h postoperatively, radiological findings consistent with acute pancreatitis, and associated clinically relevant features. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of PPAP and the rate of major complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with only transiently elevated serum amylase.

methodsA retrospective single-center observational study was conducted including consecutive patients ≥ 18 years of age undergoing PD at Karolinska University Hospital, between 2008 and 2020. Serum amylase on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2 and records from computer tomography were analyzed and correlated with postoperative major complications by logistic regressions.

resultsOf some 1078 patients that underwent PD, 284 exhibited sustained elevated serum amylase (according to PPAP criteria) and 183 transiently elevated serum amylase on either POD1 or POD2. Of the patients with sustained elevated levels, 43% (n = 123) developed major complications, but only 6.3% (n = 18) showed findings consistent with acute pancreatitis on imaging. Of the 183 cases that exhibited only transiently elevated serum amylase on either POD1 or POD2, 32% (n = 58) developed major complications.

conclusionSustained hyperamylasemia was observed in 26% of patients after PD, and an additional 17% of patients had a transient elevation of serum amylase postoperatively. Acute pancreatitis after PD may be underdiagnosed, partly by overlooking transiently elevated serum amylase and partly by requiring imaging that potentially fails to recognize mild but complication-prone acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

PancreatitisAcute DiseaseAmylasesHumansPancreatectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPropylaminesRetrospective StudiesAmylasesN-(3-phenyl-n-propyl)-1-phenyl-2-aminopropanePropylaminesAmylaseCRPOutcomePPAP

Identifiers

PMID36449249
PMCPMC9974691
OpenAlexW4310422010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.