Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36449061›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2023

Risk stratification for 1- to 2-cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: visual assessment of CT and EUS high-risk features versus CT radiomics analysis.

Xiaoxuan Jia, Lijuan Wan, Xiaoshan Chen, Wanying Ji, Shaoqing Huang, Yuangang Qi, Jingjing Cui, Shengcai Wei, Jin Cheng, Fan Chai and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoxuan JiaDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Lijuan WanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xiaoshan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wanying JiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, 100142, China.
Shaoqing HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yuangang QiDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China.
Jingjing CuiUnited Imaging Intelligence (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Yongteng North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100094, China.
Shengcai WeiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Jin ChengDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Fan ChaiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Caizhen FengDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Yulu LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Hongmei ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yingshi SunDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, 100142, China.
Nan HongDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Shengxiang RaoDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. raoxray@163.com.
Xinhua ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhangxinhua@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Youping XiaoDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China. xyp999@yeah.net.
Yingjiang YeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. yeyingjiang@pkuph.edu.cn.
Lei TangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, 100142, China. terrytang78@163.com.
Yi WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. wang_yi@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-693X
Peking University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFujian Medical University · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the ability of CT and endoscopic sonography (EUS) in predicting the malignant risk of 1-2-cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) and to clarify whether radiomics could be applied for risk stratification.

methodsA total of 151 pathologically confirmed 1-2-cm gGISTs from seven institutions were identified by contrast-enhanced CT scans between January 2010 and March 2021. A detailed description of EUS morphological features was available for 73 gGISTs. The association between EUS or CT high-risk features and pathological malignant potential was evaluated. gGISTs were randomly divided into three groups to build the radiomics model, including 74 in the training cohort, 37 in validation cohort, and 40 in testing cohort. The ROIs covering the whole tumor volume were delineated on the CT images of the portal venous phase. The Pearson test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used for feature selection, and the ROC curves were used to evaluate the model performance.

resultsThe presence of EUS- and CT-based morphological high-risk features, including calcification, necrosis, intratumoral heterogeneity, irregular border, or surface ulceration, did not differ between very-low and intermediate risk 1-2-cm gGISTs (p > 0.05). The radiomics model consisting of five radiomics features showed favorable performance in discrimination of malignant 1-2-cm gGISTs, with the AUC of the training, validation, and testing cohort as 0.866, 0.812, and 0.766, respectively.

conclusionsInstead of CT- and EUS-based morphological high-risk features, the CT radiomics model could potentially be applied for preoperative risk stratification of 1-2-cm gGISTs. KEY POINTS: • The presence of EUS- and CT-based morphological high-risk factors, including calcification, necrosis, intratumoral heterogeneity, irregular border, or surface ulceration, did not correlate with the pathological malignant potential of 1-2-cm gGISTs. • The CT radiomics model could potentially be applied for preoperative risk stratification of 1-2-cm gGISTs.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsStomach NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedArea under curveGastrointestinal stromal tumorsRisk assessmentROC curveTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID36449061
OpenAlexW4310465789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.