Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448844›Full record

Trial reportAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2023

A Latent Class Analysis of Perceived Barriers to Help-seeking Among People with Alcohol Use Problems Presenting for Telephone-delivered Treatment.

Jasmin Grigg, Victoria Manning, Ali Cheetham, George Youssef, Kate Hall, Amanda L Baker, Petra K Staiger, Isabelle Volpe, Peta Stragalinos, Dan I Lubman

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Barriers to alcohol intervention program: a scoping review.Korean journal of family medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmin GriggTurning Point, Eastern Health, Church St Richmond, 3121, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9415-3854
Victoria ManningTurning Point, Eastern Health, Church St Richmond, 3121, Australia.
Ali CheethamTurning Point, Eastern Health, Church St Richmond, 3121, Australia.
George YoussefSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd Geelong, 3216, Australia.
Kate HallSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd Geelong, 3216, Australia.
Amanda L BakerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drv Callaghan, 2308, Australia.
Petra K StaigerSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd Geelong, 3216, Australia.
Isabelle VolpeTurning Point, Eastern Health, Church St Richmond, 3121, Australia.
Peta StragalinosTurning Point, Eastern Health, Church St Richmond, 3121, Australia.
Dan I LubmanTurning Point, Eastern Health, Church St Richmond, 3121, Australia.
Eastern Health · AUDeakin University · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1125026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDespite the magnitude of alcohol use problems globally, treatment uptake remains low. This study sought to determine the proportion of people presenting to telephone-delivered alcohol treatment who are first-time help-seekers, and explored perceived barriers to help-seeking to understand the barriers this format of treatment may help to address.

methodsSecondary analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered intervention for alcohol use problems. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified participant profiles according to self-reported barriers to alcohol treatment.

resultsParticipants' (344) mean age was 39.86 years (SD = 11.36, 18-73 years); 51.45% were male. Despite high alcohol problem severity (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test: mean = 21.54, SD = 6.30; 63.37% probable dependence), multiple barriers to accessing treatment were endorsed (mean = 5.64, SD = 2.41), and fewer than one-third (29.36%) had previously accessed treatment. LCA revealed a two-class model: a 'low problem recognition' class (43.32%) endorsed readiness-for-change and attitudinal barriers; a 'complex barriers' class (56.68%) endorsed stigma, structural, attitudinal and readiness-to-change barriers, with complex barrier class membership predicted by female sex (adjusted OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28, 0.72) and higher psychological distress (adjusted OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.08, 1.18).

conclusionThe majority of people accessing this telephone-delivered intervention were new to treatment, yet had high alcohol problem severity. Two distinct profiles emerged, for which telephone interventions may overcome barriers to care and tailored approaches should be explored (e.g. increasing problem awareness, reducing psychological distress). Public health strategies to address stigma, and raise awareness about the low levels of drinking that constitute problem alcohol use, are needed to increase help-seeking.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAlcohol-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleSocial StigmaTelephone

Identifiers

PMID36448844
PMCPMC9830485
OpenAlexW4310461478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.