Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448816›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Typhoid Point-of-Care Tests: Results of a Prospective and Hybrid Retrospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Kenya and Pakistan.

Jyotshna Sapkota, Rumina Hasan, Robert Onsare, Sonia Arafah, Sam Kariuki, Sadia Shakoor, Farah Qamar, Sheillah Mundalo, Frida Njeru, Rael Too and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04801602 (Comparative Study of Commercially Available Typhoid Point of Care Tests to Benchmark Current and Emerging Tools), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04801602 completednot on this map

Comparative Study of Commercially Available Typhoid Point of Care Tests to Benchmark Current and Emerging Tools

TypeobservationalSponsorFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, SwitzerlandRan2020 to 2021Enrolled3,091ConditionsTyphoid FeverArmsRapid diagnostic tests
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Typhoid fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jyotshna SapkotaFIND-the Global Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3134-7854
Rumina HasanAga Khan Universitygrid.7147.5, Karachi City, Pakistan.
Robert OnsareCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenyan Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sonia ArafahFIND-the Global Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sam KariukiCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenyan Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sadia ShakoorAga Khan Universitygrid.7147.5, Karachi City, Pakistan.
Farah QamarAga Khan Universitygrid.7147.5, Karachi City, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-680X
Sheillah MundaloCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenyan Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Frida NjeruCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenyan Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rael TooCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenyan Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth NdegwaCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenyan Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jason R AndrewsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sabine DittrichFIND-the Global Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood and bone marrow cultures are considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of typhoid, but these methods require infrastructure and skilled staff that are not always available in low- and middle-income countries where typhoid is endemic. The objective of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of nine commercially available Salmonella Typhi rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) using blood culture as a reference standard in a multicenter study. This was a prospective and retrospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study conducted in two geographically distant areas where typhoid is endemic (Pakistan and Kenya; NCT04801602). Nine RDTs were evaluated, including the Widal test. Point estimates for sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the Wilson method. Latent class analyses were performed using R to address the imperfect gold standard. A total of 531 serum samples were evaluated (264 blood culture positive; 267 blood culture negative). The sensitivity of RDTs varied widely (range, 0 to 78.8%), with the best overall performance shown by Enterocheck WB (72.7% sensitivity, 86.5% specificity). In latent class modeling, CTK IgG was found to have the highest sensitivity (79.1%), while the highest overall accuracy was observed with Enterocheck (73.8% sensitivity, 94.5% specificity). All commercially available Salmonella Typhi RDTs evaluated in the study had sensitivity and specificity values that fell below the required levels to be recommended for an accurate diagnosis. There were minimal differences in RDT performances between regions of endemicity. These findings highlight the clear need for new and more-accurate Salmonella Typhi tests.

Indexed as

Typhoid FeverAntibodies, BacterialHumansKenyaPakistanPoint-of-Care SystemsProspective StudiesSalmonella typhiSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Bacterialblood culturepoint-of-care testsrapid diagnostic testsSalmonella Typhityphoid

Identifiers

PMID36448816
PMCPMC9769786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.