ArticleJournal of bacteriology2022
The Chemoreceptor Sensory Adaptation System Produces Coordinated Reversals of the Flagellar Motors on an Escherichia coli Cell.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Signaling mechanism of the transmembrane energy receptor Aer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Correlation of CheY-P concentration and motor behavior during attractant adaptation in singleScience advances · 2026Article
- Single-array measurements reveal non-uniform, mosaic-like chemosensory arrays in bacteria.Nature communications · 2025Article
- CheB localizes to polar receptor arrays during repellent adaptation.Science advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In isotropic environments, an Escherichia coli cell exhibits coordinated rotational switching of its flagellar motors, produced by fluctuations in the intracellular concentration of phosphorylated CheY (CheY-P) emanating from chemoreceptor signaling arrays. In this study, we show that these CheY-P fluctuations arise through modifications of chemoreceptors by two sensory adaptation enzymes: the methyltransferase CheR and the methylesterase CheB. A cell containing CheR, CheB, and the serine chemoreceptor Tsr exhibited motor synchrony, whereas a cell lacking CheR and CheB or containing enzymatically inactive forms did not. Tsr variants with different combinations of methylation-mimicking Q residues at the adaptation sites also failed to show coordinated motor switching in cells lacking CheR and CheB. Cells containing CheR, CheB, and Tsr [NDND], a variant in which the adaptation site residues are not substrates for CheR or CheB modifications, also lacked motor synchrony. TsrΔNWETF, which lacks a C-terminal pentapeptide-binding site for CheR and CheB, and the ribose-galactose receptor Trg, which natively lacks this motif, failed to produce coordinated motor switching, despite the presence of CheR and CheB. However, addition of the NWETF sequence to Trg enabled Trg-NWETF to produce motor synchrony, as the sole receptor type in cells containing CheR and CheB. Finally, CheBc, the catalytic domain of CheB, supported motor coordination in combination with CheR and Tsr. These results indicate that the coordination of motor switching requires CheR/CheB-mediated changes in receptor modification state. We conclude that the opposing receptor substrate-site preferences of CheR and CheB produce spontaneous blinking of the chemoreceptor array's output activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.