Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448651›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Randomized control trial of a decision aid for women considering elective egg freezing: The Eggsurance study protocol.

Michelle Peate, Sherine Sandhu, Sabine Braat, Roger Hart, Robert Norman, Anna Parle, Raelia Lew, Martha Hickey

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. International attitudes towards medical and planned oocyte cryopreservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michelle PeateDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2903-4688
Sherine SandhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sabine BraatCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1997-3999
Roger HartDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Robert NormanRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Anna ParleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Raelia LewDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Martha HickeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUptake of elective egg freezing has increased globally. The decision to freeze eggs is complex, and detailed, unbiased information is needed. To address this, we developed an online Decision Aid for women considering elective egg freezing. Decision Aids are the standard of care to support complex health decisions.

objectivesThis study will measure the impact of the Decision Aid on decision-making (e.g. decisional conflict, engagement in decision-making, distress, and decision delay) and decision quality (e.g. knowledge, level of informed choice, and regret). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-blinded two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Women considering elective egg freezing will be recruited using social media, newsletters, and fertility clinics. Data will be collected at baseline (recruitment), 6-month, and 12-month post-randomization. The primary hypothesis is that the intervention (Decision Aid plus Victorian Assisted Reproductive Technology Authority website) will reduce decisional conflict (measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale) at 12 months more than control (Victorian Assisted Reproductive Technology Authority website only). Secondary outcomes include engagement in decision-making (Perceived Involvement in Care Scale), distress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale), decision delay, knowledge, informed choice (Multi-dimensional Measure of Informed Choice), and decisional regret (Decisional Regret Scale). ETHICS: The study was approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (Ethics ID: 2056457). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. DISCUSSION: This is the first international randomized controlled trial that aims to investigate the effect of an elective egg freezing Decision Aid on decision-related outcomes (e.g. decisional conflict, informed choice, and regret). It is anticipated that participants who receive the Decision Aid will have better decision and health outcomes. REGISTRATION DETAILS: ACTRN12620001032943: Comparing different information resources on the process and quality of decision-making in women considering elective egg freezing.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationSocial MediaAnxietyDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproductive Techniques, Assisteddecision aiddecision-makingelective egg freezingelective oocyte cryopreservationplanned oocyte cryopreservation

Identifiers

PMID36448651
PMCPMC9720825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.