Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448598›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation

Therapeutic Efficacy of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Different Delivery Route and Dosages in Rat Models of Spinal Cord Injury.

Guangyang Liu, Zhiling Zhao, Herui Wang, Chunhua Hao, Weiting Wang, Chenliang Zhang, Tiehua Wang, Xin Li, Jingjing Xi, Shaoyun Li and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guangyang LiuStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-7106
Zhiling ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Herui WangStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Chunhua HaoState Key Laboratory of Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics, Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Tianjin, China.
Weiting WangState Key Laboratory of Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics, Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Tianjin, China.
Chenliang ZhangStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Tiehua WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin LiStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Jingjing XiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shaoyun LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haomiao LongStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Yi MiStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Li MiaoStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Yaoyao ChenStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Liqiang XuStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Libo ZhengStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Hao WangStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Ning DingStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Fengmei ZhuStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Qinggang GeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yongjun LiuStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institution, Beijing Yi-Chuang Institute of Bio-Industry, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNTianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the use of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) may be a promising strategy for treating spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) with different administration routes and dosages on SCI rats. Following T10-spinal cord contusion in Sprague-Dawley rats (N = 60), three different dosages of hUC-MSCs were intrathecally injected into rats (SCI-ITH) after 24 h. Intravenous injection of hUC-MSCs (SCI-i.v.) and methylprednisolone reagent (SCI-PC) were used as positive controls (N = 10/group). A SCI control group without treatment and a sham operation group were injected with Multiple Electrolyte Injection solution. The locomotor function was assessed by Basso Beattie Bresnahan (BBB) rating score, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), histopathology, and immunofluorescence. ELISA was conducted to further analyze the nerve injury and inflammation in the rat SCI model. Following SCI, BBB scores were significantly lower in the SCI groups compared with the sham operation group, but all the treated groups showed the recovery of hind-limb motor function, and rats receiving the high-dose intrathecal injection of hUC-MSCs (SCI-ITH-H) showed improved outcomes compared with rats in hUC-MSCs i.v. and positive control groups. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed significant edema and spinal cord lesion in the SCI groups, and significant recovery was observed in the medium and high-dose hUC-MSCs ITH groups. Histopathological staining showed that the necrotic area in spinal cord tissue was significantly reduced in the hUC-MSCs ITH-H group, and the immunofluorescence staining confirmed the neuroprotection effect of hUC-MSCs infused on SCI rats. The increase of inflammatory cytokines was repressed in hUC-MSCs ITH-H group. Our results confirmed that hUC-MSC administered via intrathecal injection has dose-dependent neuroprotection effect in SCI rats.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsHumansImmunologic FactorsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyImmunologic Factorshind limb locomotor functionintrathecal injectionmesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)neuro-protectionspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID36448598
PMCPMC9716590
OpenAlexW4310708277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.