Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448412›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2023

Prognostic value of the dynamic hepatorenal function on intermediate-term mortality in TAVI patients with survival to discharge.

Yijun Yao, Jingjing He, Tianyuan Xiong, Fei Chen, Yuanweixiang Ou, Yiming Li, Qi Liu, Zhongkai Zhu, Yi Zhang, Haoran Yang and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yijun YaoDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0868-7535
Jingjing HeDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tianyuan XiongDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fei ChenDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuanweixiang OuDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yiming LiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qi LiuDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhongkai ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Haoran YangDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yujia LiangDepartment of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin WeiDepartment of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xi LiDepartment of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yong PengDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9562-4622
Jiafu WeiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sen HeDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiao LiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yong ChenDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei MengDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guo ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenxia ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mingxia ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xuan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mao ChenDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan FengDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

West China Hospital of Sichuan University CGZH19009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal and liver dysfunctions are risk factors for mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has the potential to break the vicious cycle between AS and hepatorenal dysfunction by relieving aortic valve obstruction. HYPOTHESIS: A part of patients can derive hepatorenal function improvement from TAVI, and this noncardiac benefit improves the intermediate-term outcomes.

methodsWe developed this retrospective cohort study in 439 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI and described the dynamic hepatorenal function assessed by model for end-stage liver disease model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-XI score in subgroups. The endpoint was 2-year all-cause mortality.

resultsReceiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that the baseline MELD-XI score of 10.71 was the cutoff point. A high MELD-XI score (>10.71) at baseline was an independent predictor of the 2-year mortality hazard ratio (HR: 2.65 [1.29-5.47], p = .008). After TAVI, patients with irreversible high MELD-XI scores had a higher risk of 2-year mortality than patients who improved from high to low MELD-XI scores (HR: 2.50 [1.06-5.91], p = .03). Factors associated with reversible MELD-XI scores improvement were low baseline MELD-XI scores (≤12.00, odds ratio [OR]: 2.02 [1.04-3.94], p = .04), high aortic valve peak velocity (≥5 m/s, OR: 2.17 [1.11-4.24], p = .02), and low body mass index (≤25 kg/m

conclusionHigh MELD-XI score at baseline is an independent predictor for 2-year mortality. Patients with hepatorenal function improvement after TAVI have better outcomes. For patients with irreversible hepatorenal dysfunction after TAVI, further optimization of the subsequent treatment after TAVI is needed to improve the outcomes.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisEnd Stage Liver DiseaseTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHumansPatient DischargePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcomeaortic stenosishepatorenal functiontranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID36448412
PMCPMC9849429
OpenAlexW4310463319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.