Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448403›Full record

Observational studyMycoses2023

Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally.

James Powell, Emma Porter, Siobhan Rafferty, Sinead Field, Nuala H O'Connell, Colum P Dunne

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Mycoses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James PowellDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-4651
Emma PorterDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5532-5799
Siobhan RaffertyDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Sinead FieldDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Nuala H O'ConnellDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-4716
Colum P DunneSchool of Medicine and Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation, and Immunity (4i), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-3185
University Hospital Limerick · IEUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional testing methods for dermatophytes are time-consuming, and resource limitations in our institution have prompted curtailed access to these diagnostics.

objectivesEvaluation of our hospital's dermatological mycology diagnostic services and similar services nationally.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study on skin, hair and nail mycology samples in our institution comparing twenty five-year periods (2011-2015 and 2016-2021), including analysis of dermatology clinic data and correspondence related to fungal infection. A survey of national public hospitals' laboratories was conducted to evaluate their mycology testing capabilities.

resultsThe total 5 year test count prior to curtailment was 4851 specimens comprising 90% (n = 4344) from general practice and 6% (n = 290) from dermatology clinics. For the 5 years post curtailment, 64.5% (582/903) of specimens were from dermatology clinics. Dermatology clinic data demonstrated doubling of attendances (for all conditions) and of correspondence related to fungal infection. During this time also, national dermatological antifungal purchasing increased 11%. Ten of 28 Irish public hospital laboratories reported the provision of in-house dermatological mycology testing, and none had routine availability of susceptibility or molecular testing of dermatophytes.

conclusionThis study is the first to report an appraisal of dermatological fungal diagnostic services in Ireland. Insufficient testing capacity implies that patients are either being treated for fungal infection without appropriate diagnostic confirmation, or being left untreated because of the lack of access to diagnostics. The introduction of molecular detection methods and susceptibility systems would enhance testing capabilities and reduce the requirement for the external referral.

Indexed as

DermatologyMycosesHumansIrelandMycologySkinDermatomycosesdermatomycosisdiagnosticsmycologyPCRtinea

Identifiers

PMID36448403
PMCPMC10107536
OpenAlexW4310457187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.