ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Atasoy Flap Fingertip Reconstruction: Long-term Patient-reported Outcomes in Male Laborers.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- V advancement eversion flap for fingertip injury: Preventing ischemia and hook-nail deformity.JPRAS open · 2024Article
- Homodigital Unipedicled Islanded Neurovascular Pulp Advancement Flap/Colombo Flap for Fingertip Reconstruction: A Case Series with a Novel Technique.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atasoy flaps (AFs) are commonly used to reconstruct digits after fingertip injuries. However, recent literature reports that some surgeons prefer skeletal shortening and closure, presumably because the procedure can be performed in the emergency department without the risk of flap-associated complications. The purpose of the present outcome study is to evaluate patient-reported, long-term satisfaction of AF reconstructions for fingertip injuries. Methods: Adult, male patients working in manual labor occupations who underwent AF reconstruction for fingertip injuries were identified from an institutional database. Patients were administered an injury-specific questionnaire relating to nail growth, function, aesthetics, cryalgia, and hypersensitivity. They were then administered the QuickDASH questionnaire to report standardized functional impairment and asked about their overall satisfaction with their reconstructed finger. Results: Twelve patients underwent AF fingertip reconstruction between 2015 and 2020. Eleven of these patients agreed to be interviewed, the majority having been treated in the emergency department setting. The overall satisfaction rate was 91% (n = 10). Common sequelae included hook nail 64% (n = 7), cold sensitivity 45% (n = 5), and hypersensitivity 27% (n = 3). There were no flap failures or tissue necrosis. One patient reported a second surgery for improvement of a hook nail deformity. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of AF reconstruction for fingertip injuries demonstrate high overall satisfaction. Patients appreciated tissue salvage to preserve digit length, even in those unconcerned with aesthetics. Issues reported by patients, such as cold intolerance, hook nail, and decreased tactile sensation, are similar to other treatment options for fingertip injuries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.