Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448016›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Keller Funnel Efficacy in "No Touch" Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Suat Morkuzu, Mehmet Ozdemir, Garrison A Leach, Muholan Kanapathy, Afshin Mosahebi, Chris M Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Breast implant insertion funnels for preventing capsular contracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suat MorkuzuInstitute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex.
Mehmet OzdemirDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Garrison A LeachDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif.
Muholan KanapathyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital; and Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Afshin MosahebiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital; and Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chris M ReidDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast augmentation is one of the most common aesthetic surgical procedures. Tissue expansion followed by permanent implants is the most frequent postmastectomy breast reconstruction method. Implant contamination remains a critical problem with these procedures' resulting in acute infection as well as capsular contracture. To reduce the risk of implant contamination, the "no-touch technique" utilizing the Keller funnel has been adopted by many surgeons. This systematic review aims to investigate the advantages of the Keller funnel method for breast augmentation-reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane database, and Google Scholar was performed between 2005 and 2021. All clinical-based, retrospective and prospective studies utilizing the Keller funnel method for breast implant insertion were selected. Results: Six studies were identified for evaluation: five were retrospective cohorts and one was a prospective trial. No randomized controlled trials were found. Outcomes reported included lower rates of capsular contracture (RR, 0.42; Conclusions: This review suggests that the Keller funnel is a useful method for no-touch breast augmentation and reconstruction surgery. The Keller funnel reduces subsequent capsular contracture rate, surgical time, and incision length and allows for easier insertion. However, our findings support recommendation of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with larger population size and follow-up intervals.

Identifiers

PMID36448016
PMCPMC9699649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.