Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36448006›Full record

ArticleAlpha psychiatry2021

The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Brief Irritability Test.

Mehmet Emrah Karadere, Kürşad Çifteci, Rümeysa Yeni Elbay, Hakan Yılmaz, Hasan Turan Karatepe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet Emrah KaradereDepartment of Psychiatry, İstanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-9839
Kürşad ÇifteciDepartment of Psychiatry, İstanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5879-2640
Rümeysa Yeni ElbayDepartment of Psychiatry, İstanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1211-3542
Hakan YılmazDepartment of Psychiatry, İstanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1478-3937
Hasan Turan KaratepeDepartment of Psychiatry, İstanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6394-8312
Istanbul Medeniyet University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although irritability is a widely used term, it has no universal definition. Irritability is an emotional process that can be defined by a tendency to negative emotional states. No Turkish scale has been developed or adapted to measure irritability in adults. Consequently, this paper aims to conduct a validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Brief Irritability Test (BITe) with 5 items, which was developed by Holtzman et al. in 2015 to measure irritability rapidly and appropriately. Methods: The Turkish BITe's internal consistency and validity analysis were studied on 136 volunteering undergraduate and postgraduate students. Cronbach's alpha value was calculated for internal consistency. Concurrent, convergent, discriminant validity analyses, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to calculate structural validity. Moreover, the scale was applied to 24 people 2 weeks later to determine the temporal reliability of the Turkish BITe. Results: When the fit indices of the scale related to the CFA were examined, it was observed that it had a good fit ( Conclusion: This study reveals that the Turkish form of the BITe shows sufficient psychometric properties in the non-clinical population.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionIrritabilitymoodstress

Identifiers

PMID36448006
PMCPMC9685678
OpenAlexW3210839378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.