Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447868›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2022

The future of artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: A narrative review.

Javed Iqbal, Kainat Jahangir, Yusra Mashkoor, Nazia Sultana, Dalia Mehmood, Mohammad Ashraf, Ather Iqbal, Muhammad Hassan Hafeez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deskilling dilemma: brain over automation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Machine learning in predicting cauda equina imaging outcomes- a solution to the problem.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Javed IqbalSchool of Medicine, King Edward Medical University Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Kainat JahangirSchool of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Yusra MashkoorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Nazia SultanaSchool of Medicine, Government Medical College, Siddipet, Telangana, India.
Dalia MehmoodDepartment of Community Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Mohammad AshrafWolfson School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ather IqbalHouse Officer, Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hassan HafeezSchool of Medicine, Sharif Medical City Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms are on the tremendous rise for being incorporated into the field of neurosurgery. AI and ML algorithms are different from other technological advances as giving the capability for the computer to learn, reason, and problem-solving skills that a human inherits. This review summarizes the current use of AI in neurosurgery, the challenges that need to be addressed, and what the future holds. Methods: A literature review was carried out with a focus on the use of AI in the field of neurosurgery and its future implication in neurosurgical research. Results: The online literature on the use of AI in the field of neurosurgery shows the diversity of topics in terms of its current and future implications. The main areas that are being studied are diagnostic, outcomes, and treatment models. Conclusion: Wonders of AI in the field of medicine and neurosurgery hold true, yet there are a lot of challenges that need to be addressed before its implications can be seen in the field of neurosurgery from patient privacy, to access to high-quality data and overreliance on surgeons on AI. The future of AI in neurosurgery is pointed toward a patient-centric approach, managing clinical tasks, and helping in diagnosing and preoperative assessment of the patients.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHealth careMachine learningNeurosurgeryOperating roomTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36447868
PMCPMC9699882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.