ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022
Obstacles and Facilitating Factors in Decision-Making of Elderly Patients' Living Will in the Chinese Context-A Literature Review.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The readiness of knowledge, attitude and confidence and associated factors of implementing living wills among healthcare professionals in Shenzhen: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Knowledge and Attitudes of Hospice Care Practitioners in Guangxi, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The living will provide patients at the end of life with the autonomy to choose medical care, so that the patients at the end of life can get dignified and die. In many countries such as Europe and the United States, this choice of people is guaranteed by the law. However, China is in its infancy in the field of living wills, lacking legal support, and the Chinese people have relatively low awareness of living wills and their acceptance is not optimism. China's aging population is developing rapidly, and death education is getting more and more attention, and the popularity of living wills will increase further in the future. Objective: The aim of this review is to find out the obstacles and facilitating factors in the decision-making of elderly patients in the Chinese context, and to propose countermeasures. Methods: By searching for relevant literature in databases such as Cnki, Wanfang date, Weipu, Pubmed, Springer, Elsevier, etc., we can understand the connotation of the living wills of elderly patients at home and abroad and the obstacles and promotion factors that affect the signing of the living wills of elderly patients in China. Results: In the Chinese context, obstacles and facilitating factors in the decision-making of elderly patients' living will can be summarized at the individual, social, and national levels. The obstacles are: low quality of hospice care, social ethics, and lack of legal support. Facilitating factors include: meeting people's psychological expectations, respecting personal autonomy, conducive to the mental health of dying patients and their caregivers, and patients' willingness to accept living will. Conclusion: Need to determine relevant specific influencing factors, formulate intervention measures, and promote the development of death education in China to ensure gradual progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.