ArticleEJIFCC2022
Establishment of Population Specific Reference Intervals in Healthy Pakistani Adults for 21 Routine and Special Haematology Analytes.
Article in EJIFCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining Reference Intervals for Complete Blood Count and Micronutrient Parameters in Urban Bangladeshi Population.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Diagnostic potential of Q-flags (RBC agglutination? and fragments?) in beta thalassemia carriers: a comparative analysis with nutritional anemias.Journal of hematopathology · 2026Article
- Evolution of reference intervals for renal-hepatic biomarkers and micronutrients in normal pregnancy during Covid-19 pandemic (2021-2022) in some hospitals of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Determine Complete Blood Count Reference Values Among Healthy Adult Populations.Journal of blood medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The reference interval (RI) is an interval between two limits derived from distribution of the results obtained from a sample of the reference population. These population based RIs are of paramount significance for the accurate clinical understanding of the patient's health status. Haematological RIs are heavily influenced by a variety of geographical and environmental factors. Therefore, accrediting bodies also mandate that each laboratory should establish its own RIs in its own population. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan.Twenty-one routine and special quantitative analytes were measured in adults aged 18-60 years who passed the initial health screening questionnaire. All samples were handled strictly following standard operating procedures. Microsoft Excel and EP Evaluator software were used for statistical analysis. Nonparametric CLSI EP28-A3C method was used to establish upper and lower confidence limits at 90% significance. Results: A total of 323 participants passed the questionnaire and were short-listed for blood collection. There were 147 males and 176 females. Reference intervals were established in 297 participants after exclusion of 26 outliers with grossly abnormal test results. Analytes included: 8 red, and 12 white blood cell parameters, platelet count, immature platelet fraction, erythrocyte sedimentation levels, haemoglobin A and A2 levels and glucose-6-phosphatase dehydrogenase levels. Conclusion: Routine and special haematology RIs established in this study reflect significant differences from RIs in Caucasian population. For meaningful interpretation of test results, each haematology laboratory should establish or verify RIs in the population it serves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36447801PMC9644092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.