ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2022
Factors Influencing Trust and Trustworthiness: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study (CIPEES)-Part 3.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proposal for a Multidimensional Scale to Measure Trust Between Physician and Patient in the Aesthetic Surgery Sector.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence-based holistic, individualized facial analysis in aesthetic medicine].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Understanding clinical meaningfulness when targeting the depressor anguli oris muscle (DAO) with neuromodulators: a clinical prospective interventional study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- Are We in an Ethical Dilemma in Aesthetic Medicine?Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Aesthetic Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study of Prevalence, Awareness, and Psychological Implications.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- The Patient Voice in Aesthetic Medicine: Findings From a Global Survey of Cosmetic Neurotoxin Patients.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Using the knife to build the trust? The role of trust in the decision-making process of aesthetic surgeons and women patients/clients.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- A 360° Approach to Patient Care in Aesthetic Facial Rejuvenation.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the widely recognized importance of trust in professional relationships, it remains elusive, complex, multidimensional, and difficult to quantify due to the lack of validated tools. Objectives: The authors sought to explore both the important factors for building trust with cosmetic injectable patients and strategies for improving levels of trustworthiness in aesthetic practitioners. Methods: In order to explore factors in building trust with cosmetic injectable practitioners, a global study was conducted via an online survey. The Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study (CIPEES) survey assessed the relative importance of qualifications and training; reviewing of previous work (before and after photos); reputation; connection; time spent; online presence; and personal appearance of the practitioner in developing trust in a cosmetic practitioner. Results: The CIPEES survey collected 1488 responses across 75 countries, with 66% of participants completing all 15 questions. The respondents were 95.6% female and 4.4% male, with ages ranging from 18 to >65 years old (median 33 years old). The number 1 ranked reason for being able to trust a cosmetic injector was qualifications and training, followed by the reputation of the practitioner, and time spent by the practitioner with the survey respondent. Practitioner online presence was considered the least important factor in helping develop trust. Conclusions: The CIPEES survey results support patient trust being built through credibility, reliability, and intimacy, with low levels of practitioner self-orientation. The trustworthiness equation provides a framework for identifying practitioner weaknesses in patient relationships and actionable methods of improving trustworthiness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.