Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447607›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Assessment of Infectious Diseases Risks From Dental Aerosols in Real-World Settings.

Shruti Choudhary, Tracey Bach, Meghan A Wallace, Daniel C Stoeckel, Martin H Thornhill, Peter B Lockhart, Jennie H Kwon, Stephen Y Liang, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Pratim Biswas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shruti ChoudharyAerosol and Air Quality Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Environmental and Material Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Tracey BachDivision of Infectious Disease, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Meghan A WallaceDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Daniel C StoeckelSt Louis University Center for Advanced Dental Education, St Louis University, Missouri, USA.
Martin H ThornhillSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-4083
Peter B LockhartDepartment of Oral Medicine/Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center-Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Jennie H KwonDivision of Infectious Disease, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Stephen Y LiangDivision of Infectious Disease, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-2272
Carey-Ann D BurnhamDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Pratim BiswasAerosol and Air Quality Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Environmental and Material Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Heidi M SteinkampSt Louis University Center for Advanced Dental Education, St Louis University, Missouri, USA.
Michael J DurkinDivision of Infectious Disease, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

The National Dental PBRN - Administrative CoreU19DE028717 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2019 to 2025
$23.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE028717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infectious diseases physicians are leaders in assessing the health risks in a variety of community settings. An understudied area with substantial controversy is the safety of dental aerosols. Previous studies have used in vitro experimental designs and/or indirect measures to evaluate bacteria and viruses from dental surfaces. However, these findings may overestimate the occupational risks of dental aerosols. The purpose of this study was to directly measure dental aerosol composition to assess the health risks for dental healthcare personnel and patients. Methods: We used a variety of aerosol instruments to capture and measure the bacterial, viral, and inorganic composition of aerosols during a variety of common dental procedures and in a variety of dental office layouts. Equipment was placed in close proximity to dentists during each procedure to best approximate the health risk hazards from the perspective of dental healthcare personnel. Devices used to capture aerosols were set at physiologic respiration rates. Oral suction devices were per the discretion of the dentist. Results: We detected very few bacteria and no viruses in dental aerosols-regardless of office layout. The bacteria identified were most consistent with either environmental or oral microbiota, suggesting a low risk of transmission of viable pathogens from patients to dental healthcare personnel. When analyzing restorative procedures involving amalgam removal, we detected inorganic elements consistent with amalgam fillings. Conclusions: Aerosols generating from dental procedures pose a low health risk for bacterial and likely viral pathogens when common aerosol mitigation interventions, such as suction devices, are employed.

Indexed as

aerosolsCOVID-19dentistryinfection controlinfection preventionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36447607
PMCPMC9697589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.