Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447517›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in ecological and social psychology2023

Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research.

Adam B David, Crystal L Park, Sayaka Awao, Solmary Vega, Madison S Zuckerman, Tyler F White, David Hanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in ecological and social psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam B DavidDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.
Crystal L ParkDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.
Sayaka AwaoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.
Solmary VegaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.
Madison S ZuckermanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.
Tyler F WhiteDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.
David HannaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Rd., Storrs, CT 06269, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic emerged suddenly in early 2020, posing a serious health threat and creating tremendous stress and distress across the world. Religion has been shown to play important and varied roles in previous disasters and health crises, but its roles in the pandemic have yet to be outlined. We aimed to summarize the research conducted on religion and COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic with a systematic review of studies that specifically involved individual-level religiousness and COVID-19. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO covering a one-year period from the first published mention of the novel coronavirus (Jan. 5, 2020) through January 4, 2021. We included articles about COVID-19 that were peer-reviewed and empirical, measured and reported results on religion on an individual level, and were available in English. Our search produced 137 empirical articles that met the inclusion criteria. In the course of sorting studies by their primary focus, eight categories of empirical findings emerged: general distress and wellbeing (53 articles), COVID-19-specific stress (24 articles), beliefs in science, conspiracies, and misinformation (15 articles), COVID-19 public health behaviors (12 articles), perceived risk of COVID-19 (10 articles), perceived growth or positive changes taking place during the pandemic (nine articles), health behaviors (three articles), and consumer behavior (three articles). Findings indicated that religiousness was associated with both unique benefits and challenges and played a significant role in the pandemic. Religiousness was associated with a broad range of outcomes across geographical regions and populations during the first year of COVID-19. It was a commonly reported coping mechanism with varying levels of favorable associations with mental health and COVID-19-related behaviors.

Indexed as

AdjustmentCOVID-19Mental healthReligionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36447517
PMCPMC9694412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.