Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447395›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2023

Genomic selection performs as effectively as phenotypic selection for increasing seed yield in soybean.

Nonoy B Bandillo, Diego Jarquin, Luis G Posadas, Aaron J Lorenz, George L Graef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nonoy B BandilloDep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, 363 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5941-9047
Diego JarquinDep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, 363 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-2060
Luis G PosadasDep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, 363 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.
Aaron J LorenzDep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, 363 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-1683
George L GraefDep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, 363 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-0421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing the rate of genetic gain for seed yield remains the primary breeding objective in both public and private soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] breeding programs. Genomic selection (GS) has the potential to accelerate the rate of genetic gain for soybean seed yield. Limited studies to date have validated GS accuracy and directly compared GS with phenotypic selection (PS), and none have been reported in soybean. This study conducted the first empirical validation of GS for increasing seed yield using over 1,500 lines and over 7 yr (2010-2016) of replicated experiments in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln soybean breeding program. The study was designed to capture the varying genetic relatedness of the training population to three validation sets: two large biparental populations (TBP-1 and TBP-2) and a large validation set comprised of 457 preselected advanced lines derived from 45 biparental populations (TMP). We found that prediction accuracy (.54) realized in our validation experiments was comparable with what we obtained from a series of cross-validation experiments (.64). Both GS and PS were more effective for increasing the population mean performance compared with random selection (RS). We found a selection advantage of GS over PS, where higher genetic gain and identification of top-performing lines was maximized at 10-20% selected proportion. Genomic selection led to small increases in genetic similarity when compared with PS and RS presumably because of a significant shift on allelic frequencies toward the extremes, suggesting that it could erode genetic diversity more quickly. Overall, we found that GS can perform as effectively as PS but that measures should be considered to protect against loss of genetic variance when using GS.

Indexed as

Glycine maxSelection, GeneticGenomicsPhenotypePlant BreedingSeeds

Identifiers

PMID36447395
PMCPMC12807388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.