Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447243›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2022

Interim analysis from a phase 2 randomized trial of EuCorVac-19: a recombinant protein SARS-CoV-2 RBD nanoliposome vaccine.

Jonathan F Lovell, Yeong Ok Baik, Seuk Keun Choi, Chankyu Lee, Jeong-Yoon Lee, Kazutoyo Miura, Wei-Chiao Huang, Young-Shin Park, Sun-Je Woo, Sang Hwan Seo and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04783311 (A Phase 1/2 Dose-exploration, Randomized, Observer-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Determine Safety, Tolerance and Immunogenicity of EuCorVac-19, a Recombinant Protein Vaccine, for the Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04783311 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1/2 Dose-exploration, Randomized, Observer-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Determine Safety, Tolerance and Immunogenicity of EuCorVac-19, a Recombinant Protein Vaccine, for the Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuBiologics Co.,LtdRan2021 to 2022Enrolled279ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsEuCorVac-19, Normal Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Immunogenicity ofVaccines · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hybrid response to SARS-CoV-2 andHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan F LovellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. jflovell@buffalo.edu.
Yeong Ok BaikEubiologics, R&D Center, EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Chuncheon, South Korea.
Seuk Keun ChoiEubiologics, R&D Center, EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Chuncheon, South Korea.
Chankyu LeeEubiologics, R&D Center, EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Chuncheon, South Korea.
Jeong-Yoon LeeEubiologics, R&D Center, EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Chuncheon, South Korea.
Kazutoyo MiuraNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Wei-Chiao HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Young-Shin ParkInternational Vaccine Institute, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Sun-Je WooInternational Vaccine Institute, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang Hwan SeoInternational Vaccine Institute, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae-Ouk KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Manki SongInternational Vaccine Institute, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Chung-Jong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae-Ki ChoiCatholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea.
Jieun KimHanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Ju ChooSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea.
Jung-Hyun ChoiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. cmcjh@catholic.ac.kr.
International Vaccine Institute · KREuBiologics (South Korea) · KRUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USCatholic University of Korea · KREwha Womans University · KRHanyang University · KRNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USSoonchunhyang University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HQ20C0076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous vaccine strategies are being advanced to control SARS-CoV-2, the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic. EuCorVac-19 (ECV19) is a recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine that displays the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) on immunogenic nanoliposomes.

methodsInitial study of a phase 2 randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerance of ECV19 was carried out between July and October 2021. Two hundred twenty-nine participants were enrolled at 5 hospital sites in South Korea. Healthy adults aged 19-75 without prior known exposure to COVID-19 were vaccinated intramuscularly on day 0 and day 21. Of the participants who received two vaccine doses according to protocol, 100 received high-dose ECV19 (20 μg RBD), 96 received low-dose ECV19 (10 μg RBD), and 27 received placebo. Local and systemic adverse events were monitored. Serum was assessed on days 0, 21, and 42 for immunogenicity analysis by ELISA and neutralizing antibody response by focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT).

resultsLow-grade injection site tenderness and pain were observed in most participants. Solicited systemic adverse events were less frequent, and mostly involved low-grade fatigue/malaise, myalgia, and headache. No clinical laboratory abnormalities were observed. Adverse events did not increase with the second injection and no serious adverse events were solicited by ECV19. On day 42, Spike IgG geometric mean ELISA titers were 0.8, 211, and 590 Spike binding antibody units (BAU/mL) for placebo, low-dose and high-dose ECV19, respectively (p < 0.001 between groups). Neutralizing antibodies levels of the low-dose and high-dose ECV19 groups had FRNT

conclusionsECV19 was generally well-tolerated and induced antibodies in a dose-dependent manner that neutralized SARS-CoV-2. The unique liposome display approach of ECV19, which lacks any immunogenic protein components besides the antigen itself, coupled with the lack of increased adverse events during boosting suggest the vaccine platform may be amenable to multiple boosting regimes in the future. Taken together, these findings motivate further investigation of ECV19 in larger scale clinical testing that is underway.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as # NCT04783311.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsRecombinant ProteinsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesRecombinant ProteinsAdjuvantCOVID-19LiposomeRBDSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36447243
PMCPMC9708508
OpenAlexW4310598604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.